tarsem singh vs jito Advocate - jogendra — 104/2014

Status: Final arguments. Next hearing: 30th May 2026.

Final arguments Next hearing 30-May-2026 this date has passed

Co - Civil Suit

CNR: RJSG090001382011

Filing Number

494/2014

Filing Date

10-May-2011

Registration No

104/2014

Registration Date

10-May-2011

Court

ADJ ANOOPGARH TALUKA

Judge

1-ADJ

Last updated 27-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.tarsem singh

    Adv. SUKHVINDER SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.jito Advocate - jogendra

Case History

  1. 30-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-May-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  3. 11-May-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  4. 04-May-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    ADJ

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    ADJ

  6. 16-Apr-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    ADJ

  7. 09-Apr-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    ADJ

  8. 01-Apr-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    ADJ

  9. 19-Mar-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    ADJ

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    ADJ

  11. 05-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ

  12. 20-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ

  13. 12-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ

  14. 06-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ

  15. 29-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ

  16. 16-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ

  17. 06-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ

  18. 16-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ

  19. 03-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ

  20. 26-Nov-2025

    Awaiting records

    ADJ

  21. 13-Nov-2025

    Awaiting records

    ADJ

  22. 30-Oct-2025

    Awaiting records

    ADJ

  23. 04-Oct-2025

    Awaiting records

    ADJ

  24. 09-Sep-2025

    Awaiting records

    ADJ

  25. 30-Aug-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 104/2014 (Tarsem Singh v. Jito Advocate - Jogendra) Outcome: The court rejected the petitioner's plea. The court held that since the petitioner failed to preserve his case records and did not appear before the court on the scheduled date (08.10.2024), he was not entitled to relief. The court directed that the respondent's petition be presented before the competent authority, and the petitioner's plea for reconsideration was dismissed. A penalty of Rs. 500 was imposed on the petitioner for non-compliance and delay in proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  26. 30-Aug-2025

    Awaiting records

    ADJ

  27. 13-Aug-2025

    Awaiting records

    ADJ

  28. 21-Jul-2025

    Awaiting records

  29. 27-May-2025

    Awaiting records

    ADJ II

  30. 30-Apr-2025

    Awaiting records

  31. 08-Apr-2025

    Awaiting records

    ADJ II

  32. 15-Mar-2025

    Awaiting records

    ADJ II

  33. 24-Feb-2025

    Awaiting records

    ADJ II

  34. 10-Feb-2025

    Awaiting records

    ADJ II

  35. 10-Jan-2025

    Awaiting records

    ADJ II

  36. 09-Dec-2024

    Awaiting records

    ADJ II

  37. 11-Nov-2024

    Awaiting records

    ADJ II

  38. 08-Oct-2024

    Awaiting records

    ADJ II

  39. 05-Sep-2024

    Awaiting records

    ADJ II

  40. 20-Aug-2024

    Awaiting records

    ADJ II

  41. 22-Jul-2024

    Awaiting records

    ADJ II

  42. 04-Jul-2024

    Awaiting records

    ADJ II

  43. 06-Apr-2024

    Awaiting records

    ADJ II

  44. 01-Mar-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ II

  45. 11-Jan-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ II

  46. 28-Nov-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ II

  47. 11-Oct-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ II

  48. 01-Sep-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ II

  49. 18-Aug-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ II

  50. 28-Jul-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ II

  51. 15-Jul-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ II

  52. 07-Jul-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ II

  53. 08-May-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ II

  54. 13-Mar-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ II

  55. 14-Feb-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ II

  56. 14-Dec-2022

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ II

  57. 22-Nov-2022

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ II

  58. 28-Oct-2022

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ II

  59. 20-Sep-2022

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ II

  60. 20-Jul-2022

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ II

  61. 25-May-2022

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

  62. 25-Mar-2022

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ II

  63. 01-Feb-2022

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ II

  64. 17-Dec-2021

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ II

  65. 17-Nov-2021

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ II

  66. 06-Sep-2021

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ II

  67. 09-Aug-2021

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ

  68. 12-May-2021

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ

  69. 01-Mar-2021

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ

  70. 17-Dec-2020

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ

  71. 24-Sep-2020

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ

  72. 06-Jul-2020

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ

  73. 08-Apr-2020

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ

  74. 14-Jan-2020

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ

  75. 13-Jan-2020

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ

  76. 25-Nov-2019

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ

  77. 05-Oct-2019

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ

  78. 22-Jul-2019

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ

  79. 21-May-2019

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ

  80. 29-Mar-2019

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ

  81. 09-Jan-2019

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ

  82. 12-Nov-2018

    Awaiting records

    ADJ

  83. 27-Sep-2018

    Awaiting records

    ADJ

  84. 23-Jul-2018

    Awaiting records

    ADJ

  85. 04-May-2018

    Awaiting records

    ADJ

  86. 28-Feb-2018

    Awaiting records

    ADJ

  87. 18-Nov-2017

    Awaiting records

    ADJ

  88. 29-Aug-2017

    Further Acction

    ADJ

  89. 30-Jan-2017

    Restored

    ADJ

  90. 30-Jan-2017

    Disposed

    ADJ

  91. 30-Nov-2016

    Issues

    ADJ

  92. 29-Aug-2016

    Issues

    ADJ

  93. 14-Jul-2016

    Issues

    ADJ

  94. 17-Mar-2016

    Issues

    ADJ

  95. 25-Jan-2016

    Issues

    ADJ

  96. 03-Nov-2015

    Issues

    ADJ

  97. 12-Aug-2015

    Issues

    ADJ

  98. 02-May-2015

    Issues

    ADJ

  99. 16-Jan-2015

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    ADJ

  100. 02-Mar-2013

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

  101. 17-Jan-2013

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

  102. 14-Dec-2012

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

  103. 15-Sep-2012

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

  104. 04-Aug-2012

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  105. 10-May-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. 104/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 104/2014 (Tarsem Singh v. Jito Advocate - Jogendra) Outcome: The court rejected the petitioner's plea. The court held that since the petitioner failed to preserve his case records and did not appear before the court on the scheduled date (08.10.2024), he was not entitled to relief. The court directed that the respondent's petition be presented before the competent authority, and the petitioner's plea for reconsideration was dismissed. A penalty of Rs. 500 was imposed on the petitioner for non-compliance and delay in proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case