Suresh Kalra vs Rajasthan Goverment Advocate - APP — 75/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJSG070001202026

Filing Number

120/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

75/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

NDPS CASES LABOUR COURT COMPLEX HQ

Judge

1-Spl Sessions Judge NDPS Court

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

86

Police Station

Jawahar Nagar Police Station,Sri Ganganagar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suresh Kalra

    Adv. Rakesh Midha

  2. 2.sandeep urf baadshah

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajasthan Goverment Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 75/2026 Court Decision: The bail petition filed by petitioners Suresh Kalra and Sandeep (alias Baadshah) under Section 483 CrPC was rejected and dismissed on March 12, 2026. Key Reasoning: The court found that 47 grams of heroin was recovered from the petitioners' possession, which exceeds the small quantity threshold. Considering the quantity of contraband, the gravity of offenses under NDPS Act (Sections 8/21, 29), the petitioners' prior criminal records, and the drug menace in society, the court determined that granting bail would be inappropriate without examining the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Spl Sessions Judge NDPS Court

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 75/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 75/2026 Court Decision: The bail petition filed by petitioners Suresh Kalra and Sandeep (alias Baadshah) under Section 483 CrPC was rejected and dismissed on March 12, 2026. Key Reasoning: The court found that 47 grams of heroin was recovered from the petitioners' possession, which exceeds the small quantity threshold. Considering the quantity of contraband, the gravity of offenses under NDPS Act (Sections 8/21, 29), the petitioners' prior criminal records, and the drug menace in society, the court determined that granting bail would be inappropriate without examining the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case