Anil Urf Annu vs Rajasthan Goverment Advocate - APP — 73/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJSG070001182026

Filing Number

118/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

73/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

NDPS CASES LABOUR COURT COMPLEX HQ

Judge

1-Spl Sessions Judge NDPS Court

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

81

Police Station

Kotwali Police Station,Sri Ganganagar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anil Urf Annu

    Adv. Raman kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajasthan Goverment Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 73/2026 Case: Anil Urf Annu v. Rajasthan Government (Bail Application under Section 483 CrPC) Decision: The court rejected the bail application of Anil Urf Annu on March 12, 2026. The petitioner was arrested with 59.75 grams of heroin (chitta), exceeding the small quantity threshold. The court found the accused has a serious criminal history with prior convictions under IPC sections 380, 457 (theft/burglary) and 323, 341, 342, 34 (criminal intimidation), and considered the gravity of narcotic offences and rising drug abuse in society as grounds for denying bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Spl Sessions Judge NDPS Court

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 73/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 73/2026 Case: Anil Urf Annu v. Rajasthan Government (Bail Application under Section 483 CrPC) Decision: The court rejected the bail application of Anil Urf Annu on March 12, 2026. The petitioner was arrested with 59.75 grams of heroin (chitta), exceeding the small quantity threshold. The court found the accused has a serious criminal history with prior convictions under IPC sections 380, 457 (theft/burglary) and 323, 341, 342, 34 (criminal intimidation), and considered the gravity of narcotic offences and rising drug abuse in society as grounds for denying bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case