State vs NARSIRAM Advocate - JASVEER SINGH MISSION — 32/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 498a,304b. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJSG060001932024
Filing Number
170/2024
Filing Date
11-Jun-2024
Registration No
32/2024
Registration Date
11-Jun-2024
Court
WA Cases Shri Ganganagar District HQ
Judge
4-Spl Judge Court(wa)
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
445
Police Station
Anupgarh Police Station,Sri Ganganagar
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State
Adv. adp wa
Respondent(s)
-
1.NARSIRAM Advocate - JASVEER SINGH MISSION
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Narsiram (Session Case 32/2024) Court Decision: The defendant Narsiram was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to wife), 304-B (dowry death), and alternative charge of Section 302 (murder) due to insufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts: The prosecution alleged that Narsiram harassed his wife Renu for dowry (one motorcycle and one lakh rupees) shortly after their marriage in July 2023. The wife died on July 1, 2023, within seven months of marriage, from poisoning (organophosphorous insecticide). However, the court found that key prosecution witnesses—including the deceased's parents and relatives—contradicted the dowry harassment narrative during cross-examination, claiming instead that Renu died by suicide due to exam failure-related depression, not dowry demands. Reasoning: The court held that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant subjected his wife to cruelty for dowry demands "soon before death" as required under Section 304-B IPC. Despite FSL confirmation of poisoning, the testimony from family members did not corroborate the dowry death theory, undermining the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Spl Judge Court(wa)
-
12-Mar-2026
Final arguments
Spl Judge Court(wa)
-
07-Mar-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Spl Judge Court(wa)
-
09-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Spl Judge Court(wa)
-
18-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Spl Judge Court(wa)
-
13-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Spl Judge Court(wa)
-
18-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Spl Judge Court(wa)
-
27-May-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Spl Judge Court(wa)
-
28-Apr-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Spl Judge Court(wa)
-
15-Mar-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Spl Judge Court(wa)
-
10-Feb-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Spl Judge Court(wa)
-
12-Dec-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Spl Judge Court(wa)
-
12-Nov-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Spl Judge Court(wa)
-
07-Oct-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Spl Judge Court(wa)
-
28-Aug-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Spl Judge Court(wa)
-
01-Aug-2024
Hearing arguments on Charge
Spl Judge Court(wa)
-
03-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 32/2024
Case Summary: State v. Narsiram (Session Case 32/2024) Court Decision: The defendant Narsiram was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to wife), 304-B (dowry death), and alternative charge of Section 302 (murder) due to insufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts: The prosecution alleged that Narsiram harassed his wife Renu for dowry (one motorcycle and one lakh rupees) shortly after their marriage in July 2023. The wife died on July 1, 2023, within seven months of marriage, from poisoning (organophosphorous insecticide). However, the court found that key prosecution witnesses—including the deceased's parents and relatives—contradicted the dowry harassment narrative during cross-examination, claiming instead that Renu died by suicide due to exam failure-related depression, not dowry demands. Reasoning: The court held that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant subjected his wife to cruelty for dowry demands "soon before death" as required under Section 304-B IPC. Despite FSL confirmation of poisoning, the testimony from family members did not corroborate the dowry death theory, undermining the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts