State vs NARSIRAM Advocate - JASVEER SINGH MISSION — 32/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 498a,304b. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.

Session Case

CNR: RJSG060001932024

Case disposed

Filing Number

170/2024

Filing Date

11-06-2024

Registration No

32/2024

Registration Date

11-06-2024

Court

WA Cases Shri Ganganagar District HQ

Judge

4-SPL JUDGE COURT(WA)

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

445

Police Station

Anupgarh Police Station,Sri Ganganagar

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 498a,304b

Petitioner(s)

State

Adv. adp wa

Respondent(s)

NARSIRAM Advocate - JASVEER SINGH MISSION

Hearing History

Judge: 4-SPL JUDGE COURT(WA)

16-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Final arguments

07-03-2026

Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

09-02-2026

Prosecution Evidence

18-12-2025

Prosecution Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: State v. Narsiram (Session Case 32/2024) Court Decision: The defendant Narsiram was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to wife), 304-B (dowry death), and alternative charge of Section 302 (murder) due to insufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts: The prosecution alleged that Narsiram harassed his wife Renu for dowry (one motorcycle and one lakh rupees) shortly after their marriage in July 2023. The wife died on July 1, 2023, within seven months of marriage, from poisoning (organophosphorous insecticide). However, the court found that key prosecution witnesses—including the deceased's parents and relatives—contradicted the dowry harassment narrative during cross-examination, claiming instead that Renu died by suicide due to exam failure-related depression, not dowry demands. Reasoning: The court held that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant subjected his wife to cruelty for dowry demands "soon before death" as required under Section 304-B IPC. Despite FSL confirmation of poisoning, the testimony from family members did not corroborate the dowry death theory, undermining the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Narsiram (Session Case 32/2024) Court Decision: The defendant Narsiram was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to wife), 304-B (dowry death), and alternative charge of Section 302 (murder) due to insufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts: The prosecution alleged that Narsiram harassed his wife Renu for dowry (one motorcycle and one lakh rupees) shortly after their marriage in July 2023. The wife died on July 1, 2023, within seven months of marriage, from poisoning (organophosphorous insecticide). However, the court found that key prosecution witnesses—including the deceased's parents and relatives—contradicted the dowry harassment narrative during cross-examination, claiming instead that Renu died by suicide due to exam failure-related depression, not dowry demands. Reasoning: The court held that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant subjected his wife to cruelty for dowry demands "soon before death" as required under Section 304-B IPC. Despite FSL confirmation of poisoning, the testimony from family members did not corroborate the dowry death theory, undermining the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

WA Cases Shri Ganganagar District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case