chiman lal setia vs anupam goyal Advocate - Kuldeep chand Gargee — 81/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Contested--Decreed after Full Trial on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Suit

CNR: RJSG010018312021

Filing Number

586/2021

Filing Date

18-Oct-2021

Registration No

81/2021

Registration Date

11-Nov-2021

Court

DJ ADJ Shri Ganganagar District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed after Full Trial

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.chiman lal setia

    Adv. Amit Chhabra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.anupam goyal Advocate - Kuldeep chand Gargee

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: 81/2021 (Chiman Lal Setia v. Anupam Goyal) The court rejected the petitioner's claim that a sale deed dated 12.4.2019 for industrial land valued at ₹14 lakh was fraudulent, finding the transaction valid. While the petitioner received an initial payment of ₹3.5 lakh and remainder by 1.9.2021, the court determined no recoverable fraud existed and upheld the deed's legitimacy despite the property's actual bank valuation being approximately ₹58 lakh. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Orders

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 16-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  8. 09-Dec-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  9. 28-Oct-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  10. 20-Sep-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  11. 30-Aug-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  12. 19-Jul-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  13. 08-May-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  14. 19-Apr-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  15. 01-Mar-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District and Sessions Judge

  16. 06-Feb-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District and Sessions Judge

  17. 12-Dec-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District and Sessions Judge

  18. 28-Oct-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District and Sessions Judge

  19. 31-Aug-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District and Sessions Judge

  20. 09-Jul-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District and Sessions Judge

  21. 23-Apr-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  22. 15-Apr-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District Judge

  23. 08-Apr-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District Judge

  24. 04-Mar-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District Judge

  25. 15-Feb-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District Judge

  26. 08-Dec-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District Judge

  27. 26-Oct-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District Judge

  28. 12-Sep-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District Judge

  29. 26-Jul-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District Judge

  30. 19-May-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District Judge

  31. 31-Mar-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District Judge

  32. 15-Feb-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District Judge

  33. 19-Dec-2022

    Issues

    District Judge

  34. 01-Nov-2022

    Issues

    District Judge

  35. 13-Sep-2022

    Issues

    District Judge

  36. 19-Jul-2022

    Issues

    District Judge

  37. 11-May-2022

    Issues

    District Judge

  38. 12-Apr-2022

    Issues

    District Judge

  39. 11-Mar-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District Judge

  40. 15-Feb-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District Judge

  41. 22-Dec-2021

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District Judge

  42. 11-Nov-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 18-Oct-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 81/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 81/2021 (Chiman Lal Setia v. Anupam Goyal) The court rejected the petitioner's claim that a sale deed dated 12.4.2019 for industrial land valued at ₹14 lakh was fraudulent, finding the transaction valid. While the petitioner received an initial payment of ₹3.5 lakh and remainder by 1.9.2021, the court determined no recoverable fraud existed and upheld the deed's legitimacy despite the property's actual bank valuation being approximately ₹58 lakh. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case