Ajay kumar vs state — 155/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJSG010004652026

Filing Number

375/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

155/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Shri Ganganagar District HQ

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

315

Police Station

Jawahar Nagar Police Station,Sri Ganganagar

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ajay kumar

    Adv. Mukesh Kumar 1

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.state

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 155/2026 Summary: Ajay Kumar v. State The Additional Sessions Court rejected Ajay Kumar's second bail application under Section 483 BNSS on March 12, 2026. Kumar faced charges under BNS Sections 303(2), 317(4), and 61(2)(a) related to a car theft complaint. The court denied bail, citing Kumar's extensive criminal history of 18 pending/decided cases, predominantly theft-related offenses, demonstrating he is a habitual offender unlikely to refrain from further crimes if released. The court concluded that granting bail at this stage was unjustified given the escalating pattern of theft incidents in the area and the public interest in maintaining security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Restored

    ADJ I

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 155/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 155/2026 Summary: Ajay Kumar v. State The Additional Sessions Court rejected Ajay Kumar's second bail application under Section 483 BNSS on March 12, 2026. Kumar faced charges under BNS Sections 303(2), 317(4), and 61(2)(a) related to a car theft complaint. The court denied bail, citing Kumar's extensive criminal history of 18 pending/decided cases, predominantly theft-related offenses, demonstrating he is a habitual offender unlikely to refrain from further crimes if released. The court concluded that granting bail at this stage was unjustified given the escalating pattern of theft incidents in the area and the public interest in maintaining security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case