ASHOK KUMAR vs State — 147/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJSG010003882026

Filing Number

310/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

147/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Shri Ganganagar District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

223

Police Station

Sadar Police Station,Sri Ganganagar

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK KUMAR

    Adv. Sanjeev Kumar Dikshit

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 144/2026: Ashok Kumar v. State Court Decision: The Session Court, Sriganganagar rejected Ashok Kumar's bail petition under Section 482 CrPC. Key Facts & Reasoning: Ashok Kumar was employed as Branch Manager at Auric Motors Pvt. Ltd. During an audit in December 2023, 7 vehicles worth approximately ₹14,95,000 were found missing from inventory records, though 45 vehicles should have been present. The investigation revealed Kumar allegedly created forged receipts—altering receipt no. REC23000489 (₹5,25,000, customer Pankaj Mitra) to REC23000490 (₹5,25,000, customer Banty Kumar)—to embezzle funds. The court found the charges serious (fraud, forgery, criminal breach of trust under IPC Sections 380, 467, 468, 471, 408), the investigation ongoing, and Kumar's cooperation insufficient to warrant interim bail, rejecting his claims of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 147/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 144/2026: Ashok Kumar v. State Court Decision: The Session Court, Sriganganagar rejected Ashok Kumar's bail petition under Section 482 CrPC. Key Facts & Reasoning: Ashok Kumar was employed as Branch Manager at Auric Motors Pvt. Ltd. During an audit in December 2023, 7 vehicles worth approximately ₹14,95,000 were found missing from inventory records, though 45 vehicles should have been present. The investigation revealed Kumar allegedly created forged receipts—altering receipt no. REC23000489 (₹5,25,000, customer Pankaj Mitra) to REC23000490 (₹5,25,000, customer Banty Kumar)—to embezzle funds. The court found the charges serious (fraud, forgery, criminal breach of trust under IPC Sections 380, 467, 468, 471, 408), the investigation ongoing, and Kumar's cooperation insufficient to warrant interim bail, rejecting his claims of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case