SHAYAR KUMAR ETC vs State — 43/2026
Case under Essential Commodities Act Section 6. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 12th March 2026.
Cr. Appeal
CNR: RJSG010002592026
Filing Number
208/2026
Filing Date
13-02-2026
Registration No
43/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Shri Ganganagar District HQ
Judge
2-ADJ I
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHAYAR KUMAR ETC
Adv. Anand Kumar Vyas
MUNNA
VINOD KUMAR
Respondent(s)
State
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADJ I
Disposed
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 06-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 25-02-2026 | Compliance |
| 20-02-2026 | Compliance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 43/2026 Court Decision: The High Court (District & Sessions Division, Sriganganagar) upheld a lower court order from February 2, 2026, which seized 2,717.750 liters of diesel and a vehicle (Registration No. RJ13 GC 4773) from petitioner Shayar Kumar. The court confirmed the confiscation of the diesel under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and the Motor Spirit and High-Speed Diesel (Regulation of Supply, Distribution and Prevention of Malpractices) Order, 2005, while ordering petitioner to provide a ₹3 lakh surety bond to secure the vehicle's release pending further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 43/2026 Court Decision: The High Court (District & Sessions Division, Sriganganagar) upheld a lower court order from February 2, 2026, which seized 2,717.750 liters of diesel and a vehicle (Registration No. RJ13 GC 4773) from petitioner Shayar Kumar. The court confirmed the confiscation of the diesel under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and the Motor Spirit and High-Speed Diesel (Regulation of Supply, Distribution and Prevention of Malpractices) Order, 2005, while ordering petitioner to provide a ₹3 lakh surety bond to secure the vehicle's release pending further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts