STATE vs BHANWAR SINGH Advocate - SHREE TEJPRAKASH MATHUR — 1466/2015

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279-304A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

REG. CRI. CASE

CNR: RJSA050004182015

Filing Number

904/2015

Filing Date

07-Oct-2015

Registration No

1466/2015

Registration Date

07-Oct-2015

Court

JM-Sarada Taluka

Judge

1-Jm

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

123

Police Station

Ghasa

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279-304A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. SHREE A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHANWAR SINGH Advocate - SHREE TEJPRAKASH MATHUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: 1466/2015 Court Decision: The accused, Bhanwar Singh, was acquitted and discharged of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash/negligent driving) and 304A (death by negligence). The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly or negligently operated the vehicle that struck and fatally injured Umani Singh on August 14, 2015. Key Reasoning: While the prosecution established that a hit-and-run incident occurred resulting in death, the court determined that prosecution witnesses were partisan, contradictory, and failed to definitively identify the accused as the driver or establish that the vehicle was driven with reckless disregard. No witness reliably testified to the accused operating the vehicle negligently or with culpable intent, and the accused benefited from the presumption of innocence and benefit of doubt under Indian criminal law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 28-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  8. 19-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  9. 29-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  10. 29-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  11. 22-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  12. 18-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  13. 22-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  14. 12-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  15. 30-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  16. 11-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  17. 16-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  18. 07-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  19. 31-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  20. 05-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  21. 13-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  22. 17-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  23. 22-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  24. 29-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  25. 13-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  26. 11-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  27. 03-Jan-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  28. 21-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  29. 20-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

  30. 13-Apr-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  31. 04-Feb-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  32. 07-Dec-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  33. 27-Sep-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  34. 12-Jul-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  35. 18-May-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  36. 24-Mar-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  37. 12-Jan-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  38. 12-Oct-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  39. 26-Jun-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  40. 22-May-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  41. 18-Apr-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  42. 29-Feb-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  43. 10-Dec-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  44. 07-Nov-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  45. 07-Sep-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  46. 10-Jul-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  47. 22-Mar-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  48. 13-Nov-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  49. 20-Jul-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  50. 16-Apr-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  51. 04-Dec-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  52. 04-Sep-2017

    Prosecution Evedence

    Jm

  53. 05-Jul-2017

    Prosecution Evedence

    Jm

  54. 03-Apr-2017

    Prosecution Evedence

    Jm

  55. 23-Dec-2016

    Prosecution Evedence

    Jm

  56. 22-Sep-2016

    Prosecution Evedence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  57. 27-Jun-2016

    Prosecution Evedence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  58. 08-Feb-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  59. 07-Oct-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1466/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1466/2015 Court Decision: The accused, Bhanwar Singh, was acquitted and discharged of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash/negligent driving) and 304A (death by negligence). The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly or negligently operated the vehicle that struck and fatally injured Umani Singh on August 14, 2015. Key Reasoning: While the prosecution established that a hit-and-run incident occurred resulting in death, the court determined that prosecution witnesses were partisan, contradictory, and failed to definitively identify the accused as the driver or establish that the vehicle was driven with reckless disregard. No witness reliably testified to the accused operating the vehicle negligently or with culpable intent, and the accused benefited from the presumption of innocence and benefit of doubt under Indian criminal law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case