abhay kumar vs chanda — 97/2022

Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 01st May 2026.

Case disposed

Cm-38

CNR: RJSA010002722022

Filing Number

97/2022

Filing Date

21-Jul-2022

Registration No

97/2022

Registration Date

21-Jul-2022

Court

DJ ADJ - Salumber District HQ

Judge

2-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

01-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.abhay kumar

    Adv. SOHAN LAL CHOUDHARY

  2. 2.kailash

  3. 3.manoj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.chanda

  2. 2.meena

  3. 3.rswm limit rajasthan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-May-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case 97/2022 – Summary Court Decision: The District Judge of Salumber, Rajasthan granted the petitioners' (Abhay Kumar, Kailash, and Manoj Gandhi) petition under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, declaring them as rightful heirs entitled to 464 shares of RSWM Limited (valued at ₹5,800 each) previously owned by their deceased father Badamilal Gandhi. The court ordered issuance of a succession certificate upon payment of requisite court fees within one month. Key Reasoning: The court found that the petitioners are first-class legal heirs of the deceased, no will was executed, and the two daughters (respondents 2-3) had already renounced their claims in favor of their brothers, thereby removing any bar to the petitioners' inheritance rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  10. 08-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District and Sessions Judge

  11. 11-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District and Sessions Judge

  12. 18-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District and Sessions Judge

  13. 15-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District and Sessions Judge

  14. 23-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  15. 18-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  16. 05-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  17. 22-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  18. 10-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  19. 02-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  20. 20-May-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  21. 16-Apr-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  22. 06-Mar-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  23. 30-Jan-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  24. 20-Dec-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  25. 19-Nov-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  26. 04-Oct-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  27. 30-Aug-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  28. 20-Jul-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  29. 08-May-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

  30. 22-Mar-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  31. 16-Feb-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  32. 29-Nov-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  33. 09-Oct-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  34. 16-Aug-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  35. 20-Jul-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  36. 04-Jul-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  37. 20-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  38. 20-Mar-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  39. 08-Feb-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  40. 06-Dec-2022

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  41. 19-Oct-2022

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  42. 08-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 21-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 97/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case 97/2022 – Summary Court Decision: The District Judge of Salumber, Rajasthan granted the petitioners' (Abhay Kumar, Kailash, and Manoj Gandhi) petition under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, declaring them as rightful heirs entitled to 464 shares of RSWM Limited (valued at ₹5,800 each) previously owned by their deceased father Badamilal Gandhi. The court ordered issuance of a succession certificate upon payment of requisite court fees within one month. Key Reasoning: The court found that the petitioners are first-class legal heirs of the deceased, no will was executed, and the two daughters (respondents 2-3) had already renounced their claims in favor of their brothers, thereby removing any bar to the petitioners' inheritance rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case