PUSPA vs DAMODER LAL AND OTHERS — 51/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Disposed: Contested--Decreed after Full Trial on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Suit

CNR: RJRS110001042023

Filing Number

104/2023

Filing Date

19-Aug-2023

Registration No

51/2023

Registration Date

19-Aug-2023

Court

CJ JD Railmagra Taluka

Judge

1-Jm

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed after Full Trial

Last updated 09-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUSPA

    Adv. RAJKUMAR JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DAMODER LAL AND OTHERS

  2. 2.MANORI DEVI

  3. 3.MAYA

  4. 4.SHIVLAL

  5. 5.TEENA

  6. 6.KIRTI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    judgement/orderView PDF

    Case Summary: 51/2023 - Puspa v. Damodar Lal & Others Court Decision (dated 10.04.2026): The Civil Judge of Ralegajra granted a partial permanent injunction in favor of petitioner Puspa against respondents Damodar Lal, Manori Devi, and Maya. The court found that Puspa has established her possessory and user rights over two residential properties (a house and a courtyard) in village Saddi, Ralegajra, which she obtained from her father-in-law through a written acknowledgment dated 17.02.2002. The court held that respondents are restrained from selling, transferring, or dispossessing Puspa from the property marked "A" (the main house) without legal process. Regarding the property marked "B" (courtyard), the court found insufficient evidence of Puspa's exclusive possession and thus partially dismissed the injunction claim for that property. The order is subject to further proceedings on petition records as per procedural law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Jm

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Jm

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Jm

  7. 05-Jan-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Jm

  8. 08-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Jm

  9. 04-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Jm

  10. 19-May-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Jm

  11. 07-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Jm

  12. 18-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Jm

  13. 23-Oct-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Jm

  14. 29-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Jm

  15. 09-May-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Jm

  16. 16-Jan-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Jm

  17. 06-Nov-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Jm

  18. 11-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Jm

  19. 08-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Jm

  20. 05-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Jm

  21. 04-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 19-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 51/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 51/2023 - Puspa v. Damodar Lal & Others Court Decision (dated 10.04.2026): The Civil Judge of Ralegajra granted a partial permanent injunction in favor of petitioner Puspa against respondents Damodar Lal, Manori Devi, and Maya. The court found that Puspa has established her possessory and user rights over two residential properties (a house and a courtyard) in village Saddi, Ralegajra, which she obtained from her father-in-law through a written acknowledgment dated 17.02.2002. The court held that respondents are restrained from selling, transferring, or dispossessing Puspa from the property marked "A" (the main house) without legal process. Regarding the property marked "B" (courtyard), the court found insufficient evidence of Puspa's exclusive possession and thus partially dismissed the injunction claim for that property. The order is subject to further proceedings on petition records as per procedural law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case