STATE vs Deva etc Advocate - Pankaj Gurjar — 798/2015

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,120b. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

REG. CRI. CASE

CNR: RJRS070013862015

Filing Number

1532/2015

Filing Date

06-Aug-2015

Registration No

798/2015

Registration Date

06-Aug-2015

Court

ACJM JM Nathdwara Taluka

Judge

4-Jm No.2

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,120b

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Deva etc Advocate - Pankaj Gurjar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Judgement/OrderView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted all six accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 420 (cheating), 406 (criminal breach of trust), and 120-B (criminal conspiracy). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredients of cheating beyond reasonable doubt, particularly regarding the accused's dishonest intention at the time of the land transaction and subsequent misappropriation of funds received from the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm No.2

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm No.2

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm No.2

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm No.2

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  10. 27-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm No.2

  11. 25-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  12. 25-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Jm No.2

  13. 17-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm No.2

  14. 10-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm No.2

  15. 09-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  16. 09-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm No.2

  17. 28-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm No.2

  18. 15-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  19. 20-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  20. 03-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  21. 12-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  22. 25-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  23. 31-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  24. 11-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  25. 20-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  26. 16-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  27. 30-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  28. 15-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  29. 19-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  30. 30-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  31. 20-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  32. 04-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  33. 02-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  34. 13-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  35. 12-Dec-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  36. 10-Oct-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  37. 20-Jul-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  38. 05-Apr-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  39. 14-Dec-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  40. 02-Aug-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  41. 06-Jul-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  42. 26-Feb-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  43. 16-Oct-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  44. 13-Aug-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  45. 25-Jun-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  46. 07-May-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  47. 06-Mar-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  48. 17-Dec-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  49. 23-Sep-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  50. 25-Jun-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  51. 11-Mar-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  52. 18-Dec-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  53. 03-Oct-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  54. 21-Jun-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  55. 21-Feb-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  56. 07-Nov-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  57. 09-Sep-2017

    Appearence

    Acjm

  58. 18-Jul-2017

    Appearence

    Acjm

  59. 06-May-2017

    Appearence

    Acjm

  60. 08-Apr-2017

    Appearence

    Acjm

  61. 04-Mar-2017

    Appearence

    Acjm

  62. 17-Dec-2016

    Appearence

    Acjm

  63. 17-Sep-2016

    Appearence

    Acjm

  64. 18-Jun-2016

    Appearence

    Acjm

  65. 11-Feb-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  66. 06-Aug-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 798/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted all six accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 420 (cheating), 406 (criminal breach of trust), and 120-B (criminal conspiracy). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredients of cheating beyond reasonable doubt, particularly regarding the accused's dishonest intention at the time of the land transaction and subsequent misappropriation of funds received from the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case