hariom singh jat vs manohar singh rajpoot Advocate - Sunil Paliwal — 461/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 452,427,447,384,323,120b. Status: Prosecution Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJRS070005122018
Filing Number
511/2018
Filing Date
28-Mar-2018
Registration No
461/2018
Registration Date
28-Mar-2018
Court
ACJM JM Nathdwara Taluka
Judge
2-Acjm
Last updated 15-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.hariom singh jat
Adv. Bhagwati Lal Tak
Respondent(s)
-
1.manohar singh rajpoot Advocate - Sunil Paliwal
-
2.gokul singh rajpoot
Adv. Sunil Paliwal
-
3.prabhusingh rajpoot
Adv. Sunil Paliwal
-
4.lalit singh rajpoot
Adv. Sunil Paliwal
Case History
-
03-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-Apr-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
12-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
11-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
20-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
10-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
11-Aug-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
08-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
10-Jun-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
19-Apr-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
20-Feb-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
28-Oct-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
13-Aug-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
10-Jun-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
26-Feb-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
05-Dec-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
28-Aug-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
08-May-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
11-Jan-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
01-Dec-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
19-Oct-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
12-Oct-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
19-Jul-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
15-Feb-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
12-Oct-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
19-Jun-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
15-Feb-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
28-Sep-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
15-Jun-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
27-Apr-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
04-Feb-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
16-Dec-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
26-Sep-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
30-Aug-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
09-Aug-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
04-Jul-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
18-Apr-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
07-Feb-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
20-Nov-2018
Appearance of accused
Acjm
-
23-Aug-2018
Appearance of accused
Acjm
-
21-Jul-2018
Restored
Acjm
-
01-Jun-2018
Judgement/OrderView PDF
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed; Criminal Charges Framed Against Accused The court allowed the petition filed by Hariosm Singh and framed charges under IPC Sections 447, 427, 384, 323, and 120B against four accused persons (Manohar Singh, Gokul Singh, Prabhu Singh, and Lalit Singh) for their unlawful entry into the school, damaging property, extortion, and intimidation on 02.03.2018. The accused were ordered to furnish bail of ₹10,000 each, with case file to be submitted to the concerned police station for further investigation, with accused to appear on 30.06.2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jun-2018
Disposed
Acjm
-
31-May-2018
Compliance
Acjm
-
30-May-2018
Compliance
Acjm
-
28-May-2018
Compliance
Acjm
-
25-May-2018
Compliance
Acjm
-
24-May-2018
Compliance
Acjm
-
23-May-2018
Compliance
Acjm
-
19-May-2018
Compliance
Acjm
-
16-May-2018
Compliance
Acjm
-
11-May-2018
Compliance
Acjm
-
07-May-2018
Compliance
Acjm
-
30-Apr-2018
Compliance
Acjm
-
25-Apr-2018
Compliance
Acjm
-
11-Apr-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Mar-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 461/2018
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed; Criminal Charges Framed Against Accused The court allowed the petition filed by Hariosm Singh and framed charges under IPC Sections 447, 427, 384, 323, and 120B against four accused persons (Manohar Singh, Gokul Singh, Prabhu Singh, and Lalit Singh) for their unlawful entry into the school, damaging property, extortion, and intimidation on 02.03.2018. The accused were ordered to furnish bail of ₹10,000 each, with case file to be submitted to the concerned police station for further investigation, with accused to appear on 30.06.2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts