NARAYAN LAL KHUMAR vs VAJEER SINGH — 243/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJRS070002032022

Filing Number

199/2022

Filing Date

25-Feb-2022

Registration No

243/2022

Registration Date

25-Feb-2022

Court

ACJM JM Nathdwara Taluka

Judge

5-Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARAYAN LAL KHUMAR

    Adv. Anujeet mukhiya

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VAJEER SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Court Summary The Special Judicial Magistrate (NI Act), Nathwara, convicted the accused Vajir Singh under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque worth ₹15,00,000 that was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds. The court found that the complainant had established the essential elements of the offense—the cheque was issued by the accused for discharge of debt, presented within the statutory period, and dishonored. Although the accused raised a defense claiming he had returned part of the amount in cash before the cheque bounce, the court rejected this as insufficient to rebut the legal presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 of the NI Act, noting the cheque amount exceeded any claimed repayment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)

  8. 22-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)

  9. 02-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)

  10. 06-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)

  11. 12-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)

  12. 26-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)

  13. 24-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)

  14. 29-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)

  15. 06-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)

  16. 27-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)

  17. 29-Jun-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)

  18. 28-May-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)

  19. 06-Mar-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)

  20. 21-Nov-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  21. 03-Aug-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  22. 28-Mar-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  23. 03-Jan-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  24. 07-Sep-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  25. 06-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 25-Feb-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 243/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The Special Judicial Magistrate (NI Act), Nathwara, convicted the accused Vajir Singh under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque worth ₹15,00,000 that was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds. The court found that the complainant had established the essential elements of the offense—the cheque was issued by the accused for discharge of debt, presented within the statutory period, and dishonored. Although the accused raised a defense claiming he had returned part of the amount in cash before the cheque bounce, the court rejected this as insufficient to rebut the legal presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 of the NI Act, noting the cheque amount exceeded any claimed repayment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case