SHANKARLAL vs RATANLAL Advocate - Mayank Paliwal — 101/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJRS070000712021
Filing Number
71/2021
Filing Date
13-Jan-2021
Registration No
101/2022
Registration Date
05-Feb-2022
Court
ACJM JM Nathdwara Taluka
Judge
5-Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 15-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHANKARLAL
Adv. S. S. Paliwal
Respondent(s)
-
1.RATANLAL Advocate - Mayank Paliwal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
The court convicted the accused (Ratanlal) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque. The accused had borrowed ₹10 lakhs from the complainant and issued five cheques of ₹2 lakhs each as repayment security; two cheques were returned marked "insufficient funds." The court found the debt legally enforceable at the time of cheque issuance (dated September 1, 2017) despite the complainant's delayed demand, as the three-year limitation period had not expired when the cheques were presented in 2020. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
25-Feb-2026
Final arguments
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
11-Feb-2026
Final arguments
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
05-Feb-2026
Final arguments
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
28-Jan-2026
Final arguments
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
21-Jan-2026
Final arguments
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
07-Jan-2026
Final arguments
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
03-Dec-2025
Final arguments
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
12-Nov-2025
Final arguments
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
29-Oct-2025
Final arguments
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
08-Oct-2025
Final arguments
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
17-Sep-2025
Defence Evidence
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
10-Sep-2025
Defence Evidence
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
20-Aug-2025
Defence Evidence
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
13-Aug-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
30-Jul-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
09-Jul-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
04-Jun-2025
Defence Evidence
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
28-May-2025
Defence Evidence
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
14-May-2025
Defence Evidence
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
30-Apr-2025
Defence Evidence
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
23-Apr-2025
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
02-Apr-2025
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
10-Mar-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
01-Mar-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
04-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
16-Nov-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
25-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
24-Jul-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
05-Jun-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
08-May-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
06-Mar-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Spl. Jm (N.i. Act Cases)
-
29-Nov-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm No. 1
-
11-Oct-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm No. 1
-
21-Jun-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm No. 1
-
05-Apr-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm No. 1
-
11-Jan-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm No. 1
-
16-Nov-2022
Appearance of accused
Jm No. 1
-
07-Sep-2022
Appearance of accused
Jm No. 1
-
15-Jun-2022
Appearance of accused
Jm No. 1
-
30-Mar-2022
Appearance of accused
Jm No. 1
-
19-Jan-2022
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Acjm
-
11-Dec-2021
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Acjm
-
26-Aug-2021
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Acjm
-
12-May-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jan-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 101/2022
The court convicted the accused (Ratanlal) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque. The accused had borrowed ₹10 lakhs from the complainant and issued five cheques of ₹2 lakhs each as repayment security; two cheques were returned marked "insufficient funds." The court found the debt legally enforceable at the time of cheque issuance (dated September 1, 2017) despite the complainant's delayed demand, as the three-year limitation period had not expired when the cheques were presented in 2020. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts