Laxmi lal vs mandir mandal nathdwara Advocate - samota — 17/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 01. Status: Reply of Application/ Steps by parties. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: RJRS060004372019
Next Hearing
20th May 2026
Filing Number
248/2019
Filing Date
16-09-2019
Registration No
17/2019
Registration Date
16-09-2019
Court
ADJ Nathdwara Taluka
Judge
1-ADJ
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Laxmi lal
Adv. shyam sundar paliwal
Respondent(s)
mandir mandal nathdwara Advocate - samota
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Reply of Application/ Steps by parties |
| 11-05-2026 | Reply of Application/ Steps by parties |
| 09-05-2026 | Reply of Application/ Steps by parties |
| 06-05-2026 | Reply of Application/ Steps by parties |
| 29-04-2026 | Reply of Application/ Steps by parties |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: Lakhmilal v. Nathwara Mandir Mandal (Civil Suit No. 17/2019) Court: Additional District Judge, Nathwara, Rajsamand District Date: 05-02-2020 The court heard arguments from both parties on five issues raised by the plaintiff regarding outstanding construction work dues of ₹13,21,500 and interest claims, and the defendant's contentions regarding joinder of causes of action and jurisdiction. The order indicates that both parties were heard; however, the document does not contain the final judgment or ruling on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Lakhmilal v. Nathwara Mandir Mandal (Civil Suit No. 17/2019) Court: Additional District Judge, Nathwara, Rajsamand District Date: 05-02-2020 The court heard arguments from both parties on five issues raised by the plaintiff regarding outstanding construction work dues of ₹13,21,500 and interest claims, and the defendant's contentions regarding joinder of causes of action and jurisdiction. The order indicates that both parties were heard; however, the document does not contain the final judgment or ruling on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts