State of Rajasthan vs Prahlad Rebari Advocate - Purnashankarji paliwal — 5/2019

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8/18,8/25. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Sentenced on 12th March 2026.

NDPS. S. CASE

CNR: RJRS060004112019

Case disposed

Filing Number

179/2019

Filing Date

21-08-2019

Registration No

5/2019

Registration Date

21-08-2019

Court

ADJ Nathdwara Taluka

Judge

1-ADJ

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted and Sentenced

FIR Details

FIR Number

115

Police Station

Nathdwara Police station

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8/18,8/25

Petitioner(s)

State of Rajasthan

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Prahlad Rebari Advocate - Purnashankarji paliwal

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADJ

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Judgment

07-03-2026

Judgment

06-03-2026

Judgment

27-02-2026

Judgment

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Judgement

Summary The court convicted the accused Prahlad under Section 8/18 of the NDPS Act, 1985 for illegally possessing 90 grams of opium found during a routine police checkpoint on March 13, 2019. The court acquitted him under Section 8/25 (using a vehicle for drug trafficking) on the grounds that the accused himself was the vehicle owner committing the offense, not allowing someone else to use it. The accused was sentenced to 4 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹20,000, with an additional 2 months imprisonment in case of non-payment of the fine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

06-09-2025
Order
14-10-2025
Order
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused Prahlad under Section 8/18 of the NDPS Act, 1985 for illegally possessing 90 grams of opium found during a routine police checkpoint on March 13, 2019. The court acquitted him under Section 8/25 (using a vehicle for drug trafficking) on the grounds that the accused himself was the vehicle owner committing the offense, not allowing someone else to use it. The accused was sentenced to 4 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹20,000, with an additional 2 months imprisonment in case of non-payment of the fine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADJ Nathdwara Taluka All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case