Leela devi vs Babulal ors. Advocate - Pradeep purohit — 22/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 230. Status: Awaiting Services of notices/ summons. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)
CNR: RJRS060003382020
Next Hearing
01st July 2026
Filing Number
157/2020
Filing Date
14-09-2020
Registration No
22/2020
Registration Date
14-09-2020
Court
ADJ Nathdwara Taluka
Judge
1-ADJ
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Leela devi
Adv. Chandra shekhar sanadhya
Respondent(s)
Babulal ors. Advocate - Pradeep purohit
Kailashchandra
Parwati
Lahri bai
Dinesh
Lalit
Seema
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 12-03-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 11-03-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 21-01-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 17-12-2025 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In Civil Case No. 22/2020 (Srimati Leela Devi v. Others), the court allowed the petition and added the Tehsildar, Khimunor as Defendant No. 8 to the suit. The court found that the Tehsildar is a necessary party to the proceedings since the case involves partition of inherited agricultural land and revenue record registration, which requires the Tehsildar's involvement. The petition for adding this party was accepted, and the case was adjourned for the next hearing with directions to file a modified pleading. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In Civil Case No. 22/2020 (Srimati Leela Devi v. Others), the court allowed the petition and added the Tehsildar, Khimunor as Defendant No. 8 to the suit. The court found that the Tehsildar is a necessary party to the proceedings since the case involves partition of inherited agricultural land and revenue record registration, which requires the Tehsildar's involvement. The petition for adding this party was accepted, and the case was adjourned for the next hearing with directions to file a modified pleading. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts