Vijay vs State of Rajsathan Advocate - Add. PP Lokesh Kumar Mali — 44/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 24th March 2026.
Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC
CNR: RJRS060001452026
Filing Number
93/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
44/2026
Registration Date
23-Mar-2026
Court
ADJ Nathdwara Taluka
Judge
1-ADJ
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Refused
Last updated 27-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
52
Police Station
PS Shrinath Ji Mandir
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vijay
Adv. Mahesh Verma
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Rajsathan Advocate - Add. PP (Public Prosecutor) Lokesh Kumar Mali
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 44/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Vijay's bail application under Section 483 CrPC. Vijay was arrested on charges under IPC Sections 108 (instigating suicide) and 316(2) (causing death by act endangering life) following the death of Dinesh Tank, allegedly resulting from criminal intimidation and extortion related to stolen silver ornaments. Key Reasoning: The court found the charges serious given that Dinesh was allegedly coerced into forced confessions of theft and subjected to beatings and threats by multiple accused persons, ultimately leading to his death. The court noted no prior criminal record existed against Vijay, but considered the grave nature of the allegations and the ongoing investigation insufficient to grant bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ
-
23-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 44/2026
Case Summary: 44/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Vijay's bail application under Section 483 CrPC. Vijay was arrested on charges under IPC Sections 108 (instigating suicide) and 316(2) (causing death by act endangering life) following the death of Dinesh Tank, allegedly resulting from criminal intimidation and extortion related to stolen silver ornaments. Key Reasoning: The court found the charges serious given that Dinesh was allegedly coerced into forced confessions of theft and subjected to beatings and threats by multiple accused persons, ultimately leading to his death. The court noted no prior criminal record existed against Vijay, but considered the grave nature of the allegations and the ongoing investigation insufficient to grant bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts