State of Rajasthan vs Radheyshyam Urf Panther Advocate - Lalit Sahu — 206/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,332,353,307,326. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

Session Case

CNR: RJRS010030332023

Filing Number

2523/2023

Filing Date

20-Dec-2023

Registration No

206/2023

Registration Date

20-Dec-2023

Court

DJ ADJ Rajsamand District HQ

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 09-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

377

Police Station

PS DEVGARH

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,332,353,307,326
Arms Act Section 4/25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Rajasthan

    Adv. PP DJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Radheyshyam Urf Panther Advocate - Lalit Sahu

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    order/judgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Rajasthan v. Radheyshyam Urf Panther (206/2023) The court acquitted the accused Radheyshyam on charges under IPC sections 341, 326, 307, 332, 353 and Arms Act 4/25, finding insufficient evidence to prove he deliberately stabbed the complainant Kishanlaul with a knife on 22.09.2023. While medical evidence confirmed serious abdominal injuries requiring surgery, the court noted the prosecution failed to establish the accused's direct involvement—key witnesses (including the injured party himself) testified he fell from a roadside embankment, and no forensic evidence linked the weapon to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    District Judge

  5. 20-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  8. 04-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  9. 22-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  10. 29-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  11. 29-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  12. 15-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  13. 14-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  14. 07-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  15. 19-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  16. 13-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  17. 26-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  18. 06-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  19. 29-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  20. 08-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  21. 11-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 20-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 206/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Rajasthan v. Radheyshyam Urf Panther (206/2023) The court acquitted the accused Radheyshyam on charges under IPC sections 341, 326, 307, 332, 353 and Arms Act 4/25, finding insufficient evidence to prove he deliberately stabbed the complainant Kishanlaul with a knife on 22.09.2023. While medical evidence confirmed serious abdominal injuries requiring surgery, the court noted the prosecution failed to establish the accused's direct involvement—key witnesses (including the injured party himself) testified he fell from a roadside embankment, and no forensic evidence linked the weapon to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case