Bhura lal vs State of Rajasthan Advocate - pp — 159/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,406. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Revision

CNR: RJRS010024162022

Filing Number

1968/2022

Filing Date

14-Oct-2022

Registration No

159/2022

Registration Date

14-Oct-2022

Court

DJ ADJ Rajsamand District HQ

Judge

7-Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Last updated 09-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,406

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bhura lal

    Adv. Sampatlal ladda

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Rajasthan Advocate - pp (Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    order/judgementView PDF

    Case Summary: Bhura Lal v. State of Rajasthan (159/2022) The court rejected Bhura Lal's revision petition challenging a lower court order regarding disputed rental payments (₹1,44,000) for a compressor drill machine. Finding no evidence of fraud or intentional wrongdoing by the accused officer who had provided three cheques of ₹75,000 (which bounced), the court upheld the original order as legally sound and properly reasoned. The court held that the revision petition lacked merit since both parties had conflicting claims about the machine rental amount, making it a civil matter rather than a criminal one. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  8. 21-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  10. 11-Nov-2025

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  11. 25-Aug-2025

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  12. 07-Jul-2025

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  13. 26-May-2025

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  14. 09-Apr-2025

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  15. 19-Feb-2025

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  16. 06-Jan-2025

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  17. 27-Nov-2024

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  18. 09-Oct-2024

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  19. 07-Sep-2024

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  20. 05-Aug-2024

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  21. 11-Jun-2024

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  22. 06-May-2024

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  23. 19-Mar-2024

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  24. 05-Feb-2024

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  25. 05-Dec-2023

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  26. 18-Oct-2023

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  27. 02-Sep-2023

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  28. 14-Aug-2023

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  29. 12-Jun-2023

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  30. 12-Apr-2023

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  31. 27-Feb-2023

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  32. 19-Dec-2022

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  33. 30-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 14-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 159/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Bhura Lal v. State of Rajasthan (159/2022) The court rejected Bhura Lal's revision petition challenging a lower court order regarding disputed rental payments (₹1,44,000) for a compressor drill machine. Finding no evidence of fraud or intentional wrongdoing by the accused officer who had provided three cheques of ₹75,000 (which bounced), the court upheld the original order as legally sound and properly reasoned. The court held that the revision petition lacked merit since both parties had conflicting claims about the machine rental amount, making it a civil matter rather than a criminal one. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case