Kyali lal vs State of Rajasthan Advocate - pp — 155/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 427. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Revision

CNR: RJRS010023832022

Filing Number

1944/2022

Filing Date

12-Oct-2022

Registration No

155/2022

Registration Date

12-Oct-2022

Court

DJ ADJ Rajsamand District HQ

Judge

7-Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Last updated 09-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 427
Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act Section 3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kyali lal

    Adv. Sampatlal ladda

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Rajasthan Advocate - pp (Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    order/judgementView PDF

    Case Summary: Kyali Lal v. State of Rajasthan (Case 155/2022) The Special Judge for SC/ST cases in Rajsamand rejected Kyali Lal's revision petition challenging the lower court's order dismissing his complaint against Mehendra regarding alleged illegal stone mining and property damage. The court found that Kyali Lal filed the petition approximately 10 years after the alleged incident (dated 07.01.2008 but filed 20.10.2018) without adequate explanation for the delay, and concluded his complaint lacked merit as it appeared to be motivated by a prior civil dispute rather than genuine injury. The original magistrate's order was upheld as legally sound and within jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  10. 11-Nov-2025

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  11. 25-Aug-2025

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  12. 07-Jul-2025

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  13. 26-May-2025

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  14. 09-Apr-2025

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  15. 19-Feb-2025

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  16. 06-Jan-2025

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  17. 27-Nov-2024

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  18. 09-Oct-2024

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  19. 07-Sep-2024

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  20. 05-Aug-2024

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  21. 11-Jun-2024

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  22. 30-Apr-2024

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  23. 18-Mar-2024

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  24. 01-Feb-2024

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  25. 12-Dec-2023

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  26. 19-Oct-2023

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  27. 23-Aug-2023

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  28. 21-Jun-2023

    Final arguments

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Cases

  29. 13-Apr-2023

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  30. 03-Feb-2023

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  31. 29-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 12-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 155/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Kyali Lal v. State of Rajasthan (Case 155/2022) The Special Judge for SC/ST cases in Rajsamand rejected Kyali Lal's revision petition challenging the lower court's order dismissing his complaint against Mehendra regarding alleged illegal stone mining and property damage. The court found that Kyali Lal filed the petition approximately 10 years after the alleged incident (dated 07.01.2008 but filed 20.10.2018) without adequate explanation for the delay, and concluded his complaint lacked merit as it appeared to be motivated by a prior civil dispute rather than genuine injury. The original magistrate's order was upheld as legally sound and within jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case