Sundar bai vs Prabhu lal — 39/2022
Case under --- Section 01. Status: Final arguments. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: RJRS010014112022
Filing Number
272/2022
Filing Date
27-Jun-2022
Registration No
39/2022
Registration Date
27-Jun-2022
Court
DJ ADJ Rajsamand District HQ
Judge
1-District Judge
Last updated 09-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sundar bai
Adv. Sunil Bohra
Respondent(s)
-
1.Prabhu lal
-
2.Dalu
-
3.Badri lal
-
4.Tehseeldaar Railmagra
-
5.Up panjiyak Railmagra
Case History
-
29-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jul-2026
Final arguments
District Judge
-
20-May-2026
Final arguments
District Judge
-
22-Apr-2026
Final arguments
District Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Final arguments
District Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Final arguments
District Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Final arguments
District Judge
-
14-Jan-2026
Final arguments
District Judge
-
13-Oct-2025
Final arguments
District Judge
-
15-Sep-2025
Final arguments
District Judge
-
06-Aug-2025
Final arguments
District Judge
-
07-Jul-2025
Final arguments
District Judge
-
21-May-2025
Final arguments
District Judge
-
15-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
District Judge
-
25-Feb-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
District Judge
-
02-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
District Judge
-
18-Sep-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
District Judge
-
29-Jul-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
District Judge
-
16-Apr-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
District Judge
-
06-Mar-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
District Judge
-
03-Feb-2024
Issues
District Judge
-
20-Jan-2024
Issues
District Judge
-
02-Dec-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Nov-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Oct-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Aug-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Jul-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Apr-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Jan-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Dec-2022
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Nov-2022
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Sep-2022
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Aug-2022
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Aug-2022
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Aug-2022
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Jul-2022
order/judgementView PDF
Case Summary: 39/2022 Outcome: The petition filed by Respondent No. 2 (Dalu) under Section 10 read with Section 151 CPC was rejected and dismissed by the District Judge, Rajsamand on 27.07.2022. Key Facts: Petitioner Sundar Bai sought to nullify a registered sale deed executed by Respondent No. 2 in favor of Respondent No. 1 concerning agricultural land in Chaukdi village. Before filing this suit, Sundar Bai had filed a declaration petition before the Revenue Court against Respondents 2, 3, and co-owners, which remains pending. The court found that jurisdiction over the relief sought (cancellation of the sale deed) belongs to the Civil Court, not the Revenue Court, and that Section 10 CPC provisions did not apply to the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Jul-2022
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Jul-2022
Orders
District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Jul-2022
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
District Judge
-
01-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 39/2022
Case Summary: 39/2022 Outcome: The petition filed by Respondent No. 2 (Dalu) under Section 10 read with Section 151 CPC was rejected and dismissed by the District Judge, Rajsamand on 27.07.2022. Key Facts: Petitioner Sundar Bai sought to nullify a registered sale deed executed by Respondent No. 2 in favor of Respondent No. 1 concerning agricultural land in Chaukdi village. Before filing this suit, Sundar Bai had filed a declaration petition before the Revenue Court against Respondents 2, 3, and co-owners, which remains pending. The court found that jurisdiction over the relief sought (cancellation of the sale deed) belongs to the Civil Court, not the Revenue Court, and that Section 10 CPC provisions did not apply to the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts