State of Rajasthan vs suresh Advocate - Dungar Singh Banjara — 70/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 304. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

Session Case

CNR: RJRS010008912019

Filing Number

702/2019

Filing Date

06-Jul-2019

Registration No

70/2019

Registration Date

06-Jul-2019

Court

DJ ADJ Rajsamand District HQ

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 09-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

84

Police Station

PS DEVGARH

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 304

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Rajasthan

    Adv. PP DJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.suresh Advocate - Dungar Singh Banjara

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    order/judgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Rajasthan v. Suresh (70/2019) The court acquitted accused Suresh of charges under IPC Section 304 (causing death by negligence) in the death of Gopal. The prosecution alleged the accused beat Gopal, causing fatal injuries, but the court found insufficient evidence. Medical examination revealed no visible external injuries on the deceased; the postmortem attributed death to internal bleeding from a penetrating injury, contradicting claims of beatings. Key witnesses (including the deceased's family members) consistently stated the deceased fell accidentally while intoxicated, refuting allegations of deliberate assault. The court held the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused the death. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 11-May-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  9. 19-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  10. 25-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  11. 28-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  12. 07-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  13. 06-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  14. 26-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  15. 25-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  16. 30-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  17. 02-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  18. 03-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  19. 16-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  20. 05-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  21. 20-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  22. 02-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  23. 28-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  24. 09-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  25. 27-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  26. 29-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  27. 18-Dec-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  28. 17-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  29. 16-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  30. 05-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  31. 08-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  32. 26-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  33. 26-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  34. 21-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  35. 28-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  36. 13-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  37. 07-Jan-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  38. 03-Dec-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  39. 01-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  40. 19-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  41. 06-Aug-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  42. 11-Jul-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  43. 24-May-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  44. 27-Apr-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  45. 28-Feb-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  46. 15-Jan-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  47. 11-Nov-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  48. 24-Aug-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  49. 23-Aug-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  50. 21-Jun-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  51. 26-Mar-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  52. 25-Jan-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  53. 18-Nov-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  54. 07-Oct-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  55. 04-Aug-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  56. 02-May-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  57. 28-Feb-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  58. 02-Jan-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  59. 11-Dec-2019

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    District Judge

  60. 11-Nov-2019

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    District Judge

  61. 30-Sep-2019

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    District Judge

  62. 31-Aug-2019

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    District Judge

  63. 21-Aug-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  64. 06-Jul-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 70/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Rajasthan v. Suresh (70/2019) The court acquitted accused Suresh of charges under IPC Section 304 (causing death by negligence) in the death of Gopal. The prosecution alleged the accused beat Gopal, causing fatal injuries, but the court found insufficient evidence. Medical examination revealed no visible external injuries on the deceased; the postmortem attributed death to internal bleeding from a penetrating injury, contradicting claims of beatings. Key witnesses (including the deceased's family members) consistently stated the deceased fell accidentally while intoxicated, refuting allegations of deliberate assault. The court held the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused the death. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case