Vikarm Singh vs State of Rajasthan Advocate - Gopal Jat — 53/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497503. Disposed: Contested--Disposed otherwise on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC

CNR: RJRS010004992026

Filing Number

400/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

53/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Rajsamand District HQ

Judge

6-ADJ

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed otherwise

Last updated 09-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

216

Police Station

PS CHARBHUJA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vikarm Singh

    Adv. Mahipal Singh Sisodiya

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Rajasthan Advocate - Gopal Jat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    order/judgementView PDF

    Case Summary: Vikarm Singh v. State of Rajasthan (Case 53/2026) The court conditionally approved the petitioner's application for release of his seized Splendor motorcycle (RJ.30.SC.4147) on bail. The vehicle was seized during an alleged drug trafficking case, but the court found no evidence linking the petitioner to the contraband or establishing that police require the vehicle for investigation. The court granted release subject to a ₹60,000 surety bond and specific conditions: the petitioner must present the vehicle whenever required by the court, maintain it in proper condition, not alter its identifying features, and not use it for any illegal purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 53/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Vikarm Singh v. State of Rajasthan (Case 53/2026) The court conditionally approved the petitioner's application for release of his seized Splendor motorcycle (RJ.30.SC.4147) on bail. The vehicle was seized during an alleged drug trafficking case, but the court found no evidence linking the petitioner to the contraband or establishing that police require the vehicle for investigation. The court granted release subject to a ₹60,000 surety bond and specific conditions: the petitioner must present the vehicle whenever required by the court, maintain it in proper condition, not alter its identifying features, and not use it for any illegal purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case