Shravan Nath vs State of Rajasthan Advocate - PP DJ — 182/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJRS010004782026

e-Filing Number

18-03-2026

Filing Number

384/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

182/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Rajsamand District HQ

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

Last updated 27-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

150

Police Station

PS CHARBHUJA

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shravan Nath

    Adv. Yashwant Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Rajasthan Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor) DJ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    order/judgementView PDF

    Case Summary: 182/2026 - Shravan Nath v. State of Rajasthan Court Decision: The Session Court, Rajsamand, rejected the bail application of accused Shravan Nath under Section 483 CrPC on March 23, 2026. The court found that the accused had deliberately absconded and misused bail facilities to delay proceedings, remaining absent for over seven years (from May 1, 2019 to March 9, 2026) despite a standing arrest warrant. The court determined that granting bail would likely obstruct further trial proceedings, making bail inappropriate in these circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 182/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 182/2026 - Shravan Nath v. State of Rajasthan Court Decision: The Session Court, Rajsamand, rejected the bail application of accused Shravan Nath under Section 483 CrPC on March 23, 2026. The court found that the accused had deliberately absconded and misused bail facilities to delay proceedings, remaining absent for over seven years (from May 1, 2019 to March 9, 2026) despite a standing arrest warrant. The court determined that granting bail would likely obstruct further trial proceedings, making bail inappropriate in these circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case