Hemendra Singh @Hemsingh vs State of Rajasthan Advocate - PP DJ — 180/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJRS010004752026

e-Filing Number

18-03-2026

Filing Number

381/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

180/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Rajsamand District HQ

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 27-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

310

Police Station

PS BHIM

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hemendra Singh @Hemsingh

    Adv. Sunil Panwar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Rajasthan Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor) DJ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    order/judgementView PDF

    Case 180/2026 Summary Hemendra Singh's bail application was GRANTED by the Rajasthan District Court on March 23, 2026. The petitioner, arrested on March 16, 2025, faced charges under IPC sections 140(3), 127(2), 115(2), and 117(2) for allegedly kidnapping and assaulting a victim along with co-accused. The court noted no prior criminal record, no interrogation required, and that co-accused's bail was already approved, making the case appear routine. Bail was approved with surety conditions: ₹1,00,000 personal bond and two sureties of ₹50,000 each, with no adverse comments on merits given the investigation's preliminary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 180/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 180/2026 Summary Hemendra Singh's bail application was GRANTED by the Rajasthan District Court on March 23, 2026. The petitioner, arrested on March 16, 2025, faced charges under IPC sections 140(3), 127(2), 115(2), and 117(2) for allegedly kidnapping and assaulting a victim along with co-accused. The court noted no prior criminal record, no interrogation required, and that co-accused's bail was already approved, making the case appear routine. Bail was approved with surety conditions: ₹1,00,000 personal bond and two sureties of ₹50,000 each, with no adverse comments on merits given the investigation's preliminary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case