mukesh choudhary vs sandeep kumar — 420/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled by ADR on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJPG090007972024

Filing Number

797/2024

Filing Date

27-Aug-2024

Registration No

420/2024

Registration Date

27-Aug-2024

Court

ACJM TALUKACOURT DHARIYAWAD

Judge

10-Acjm

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settled by ADR

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.mukesh choudhary

    Adv. SAIYAD TAJ MOHAMMAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.sandeep kumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 420/2024 Summary The court dismissed petitioner Mukesh Choudhary's petition challenging the competency of respondent Sandeep Kumar (appointed under Section 138 IPC). The court found no grounds to question the appointment and held that the petition lacked merit. The court ordered the petition to be dismissed as there are no remaining issues for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 04-Feb-2026

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  5. 26-Nov-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  6. 04-Sep-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  7. 27-Jun-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  8. 20-Mar-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  9. 27-Jan-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  10. 25-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 27-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 420/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 420/2024 Summary The court dismissed petitioner Mukesh Choudhary's petition challenging the competency of respondent Sandeep Kumar (appointed under Section 138 IPC). The court found no grounds to question the appointment and held that the petition lacked merit. The court ordered the petition to be dismissed as there are no remaining issues for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case