Dilip vs Jitendra Advocate - HARISH MEGHWAL — 143/2019

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Sentenced on 10th March 2026.

Complaint

CNR: RJPG090003292019

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

329/2019

Filing Date

14-03-2019

Registration No

143/2019

Registration Date

14-03-2019

Court

ACJM TALUKACOURT DHARIYAWAD

Judge

10-ACJM

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted and Sentenced

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Dilip

Adv. HARISINGH KOTHARI

Respondent(s)

Jitendra Advocate - HARISH MEGHWAL

Hearing History

Judge: 10-ACJM

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

26-02-2026

Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

18-02-2026

Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

10-02-2026

Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Judgement

Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Dhariawad, Pratapgarh, Rajasthan convicted the accused Jitendra Gargu under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring a check of ₹2,80,000 issued to repay a loan. The court found that the accused issued the check dated 09.10.2018, which was dishonored due to insufficient funds, and despite receiving a legal notice within the statutory period, failed to pay the amount. The court sentenced him to one year imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹3,80,000, with an additional 15 days imprisonment in case of non-payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

22-11-2022
Order
casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Dhariawad, Pratapgarh, Rajasthan convicted the accused Jitendra Gargu under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring a check of ₹2,80,000 issued to repay a loan. The court found that the accused issued the check dated 09.10.2018, which was dishonored due to insufficient funds, and despite receiving a legal notice within the statutory period, failed to pay the amount. The court sentenced him to one year imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹3,80,000, with an additional 15 days imprisonment in case of non-payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ACJM TALUKACOURT DHARIYAWAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case