Me. Jaroli biz Bhanadar AS Sanjay vs Jitendra Kumar — 361/2017
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled by ADR on 14th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJPG070008612017
Filing Number
857/2017
Filing Date
15-12-2017
Registration No
361/2017
Registration Date
15-12-2017
Court
ACJM TALUKACOURT CHHOTISADARI
Judge
9-Senior Civil Judge and ACJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled by ADR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Me. Jaroli biz Bhanadar AS Sanjay
Adv. SH. ROHITASH PANCHOLI
Respondent(s)
Jitendra Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Senior Civil Judge and ACJM
Disposed
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-02-2026 | Service of Summons/bailable warrant |
| 17-12-2025 | Service of Summons/bailable warrant |
| 06-09-2025 | Service of Summons/bailable warrant |
| 14-05-2025 | Service of Summons/bailable warrant |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 361/2017 Summary The court discharged the petition filed by Me. Jaroli biz Bhanadar AS Sanjay against Jitendra Kumar and others. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish that the appropriate middle path for the dispute existed under the public court system, and held that the petition lacked legal merit and contained no actionable grounds for relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 361/2017 Summary The court discharged the petition filed by Me. Jaroli biz Bhanadar AS Sanjay against Jitendra Kumar and others. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish that the appropriate middle path for the dispute existed under the public court system, and held that the petition lacked legal merit and contained no actionable grounds for relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts