Me. Jaroli biz Bhanadar AS Sanjay vs Jitendra Kumar — 361/2017
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled by ADR on 14th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJPG070008612017
Filing Number
857/2017
Filing Date
15-Dec-2017
Registration No
361/2017
Registration Date
15-Dec-2017
Court
ACJM TALUKACOURT CHHOTISADARI
Judge
9-Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled by ADR
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Me. Jaroli biz Bhanadar AS Sanjay
Adv. SH. ROHITASH PANCHOLI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jitendra Kumar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case 361/2017 Summary The court discharged the petition filed by Me. Jaroli biz Bhanadar AS Sanjay against Jitendra Kumar and others. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish that the appropriate middle path for the dispute existed under the public court system, and held that the petition lacked legal merit and contained no actionable grounds for relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
25-Feb-2026
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
17-Dec-2025
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
06-Sep-2025
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
14-May-2025
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
13-Feb-2025
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
12-Nov-2024
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
28-Aug-2024
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
CJM
-
26-Jun-2024
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
CJM
-
20-Mar-2024
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
31-Oct-2023
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
11-May-2023
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
30-Jan-2023
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
23-Nov-2022
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
28-Sep-2022
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
13-Jul-2022
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
-
15-Mar-2022
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
12-Mar-2022
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
15-Dec-2021
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
15-Sep-2021
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
12-Jul-2021
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
04-May-2021
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
18-Feb-2021
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
16-Dec-2020
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
15-Oct-2020
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
15-Jul-2020
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
13-May-2020
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
16-Mar-2020
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
06-Jan-2020
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
28-Nov-2019
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
24-Sep-2019
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
23-Jul-2019
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
09-May-2019
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
16-Feb-2019
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
05-Dec-2018
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
30-Aug-2018
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
08-Jun-2018
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
04-Apr-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Dec-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 361/2017
Case 361/2017 Summary The court discharged the petition filed by Me. Jaroli biz Bhanadar AS Sanjay against Jitendra Kumar and others. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish that the appropriate middle path for the dispute existed under the public court system, and held that the petition lacked legal merit and contained no actionable grounds for relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts