State Goverment vs JItendra Singh Advocate - SH. RAJESH MANGRORA — 166/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,452,382,427,147,149,. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 01st April 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJPG070003982025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
398/2025
Filing Date
09-06-2025
Registration No
166/2025
Registration Date
09-06-2025
Court
ACJM TALUKACOURT CHHOTISADARI
Judge
9-Senior Civil Judge and ACJM
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
88
Police Station
Dholapani
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Goverment
Respondent(s)
JItendra Singh Advocate - SH. RAJESH MANGRORA
Surendra SIngh aka Kana
Ramesh
Ranjit Kumar aka Rahul
Rakesh Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Senior Civil Judge and ACJM
Disposed
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 13-11-2025 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 13-08-2025 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 28-07-2025 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chotisadri, Pratapgarh, Rajasthan acquitted all five accused persons on April 1, 2026, of charges under IPC Sections 147, 452, and 382 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the allegations of rioting, criminal trespass, and theft beyond reasonable doubt. Additionally, the accused were acquitted on charges under Sections 323, 427, and 149 IPC through a settlement (Rajinama) between both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chotisadri, Pratapgarh, Rajasthan acquitted all five accused persons on April 1, 2026, of charges under IPC Sections 147, 452, and 382 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the allegations of rioting, criminal trespass, and theft beyond reasonable doubt. Additionally, the accused were acquitted on charges under Sections 323, 427, and 149 IPC through a settlement (Rajinama) between both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts