State Goverment vs JItendra Singh Advocate - SH. RAJESH MANGRORA — 166/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,452,382,427,147,149. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 01st April 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJPG070003982025
Filing Number
398/2025
Filing Date
09-Jun-2025
Registration No
166/2025
Registration Date
09-Jun-2025
Court
ACJM TALUKACOURT CHHOTISADARI
Judge
9-Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
88
Police Station
Dholapani
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Goverment
Respondent(s)
-
1.JItendra Singh Advocate - SH. RAJESH MANGRORA
-
2.Surendra SIngh aka Kana
-
3.Ramesh
-
4.Ranjit Kumar aka Rahul
-
5.Rakesh Kumar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chotisadri, Pratapgarh, Rajasthan acquitted all five accused persons on April 1, 2026, of charges under IPC Sections 147, 452, and 382 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the allegations of rioting, criminal trespass, and theft beyond reasonable doubt. Additionally, the accused were acquitted on charges under Sections 323, 427, and 149 IPC through a settlement (Rajinama) between both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
09-Mar-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
13-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
13-Aug-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
28-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 166/2025
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chotisadri, Pratapgarh, Rajasthan acquitted all five accused persons on April 1, 2026, of charges under IPC Sections 147, 452, and 382 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the allegations of rioting, criminal trespass, and theft beyond reasonable doubt. Additionally, the accused were acquitted on charges under Sections 323, 427, and 149 IPC through a settlement (Rajinama) between both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts