gopal lal vs akbar husain — 31/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,467,468,471,120,. Status: Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
Complaint
CNR: RJPG070001802024
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
180/2024
Filing Date
20-02-2024
Registration No
31/2024
Registration Date
20-02-2024
Court
ACJM TALUKACOURT CHHOTISADARI
Judge
9-Senior Civil Judge and ACJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
gopal lal
Adv. SH. SHANTILAL KOTHARI
Respondent(s)
akbar husain
mahipalsingh
goverdhansingh
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Senior Civil Judge and ACJM
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service | |
| 17-01-2026 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service | |
| 25-11-2025 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service | |
| 10-10-2025 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service | |
| 25-09-2025 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chotisadri (Pratapgarh, Rajasthan) took cognizance of a complaint alleging that Patwar Abrar Husain and Tehsildar Mahipal Singh, in collusion with Govardhan Singh, created forged revenue documents to fraudulently transfer agricultural land (Plot Nos. 116, 117, 118 in Gudli village) belonging to Hemlata to Govardhan Singh, using fabricated witness signatures. The court found prima facie evidence of forgery and criminal breach of trust under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, and 471/120B against Abrar Husain and Govardhan Singh, but held insufficient grounds against Tehsildar Mahipal Singh. The court ordered that prosecution approval under Section 197 CrPC be obtained from the District Collector before proceeding further, with the next hearing scheduled for September 25, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chotisadri (Pratapgarh, Rajasthan) took cognizance of a complaint alleging that Patwar Abrar Husain and Tehsildar Mahipal Singh, in collusion with Govardhan Singh, created forged revenue documents to fraudulently transfer agricultural land (Plot Nos. 116, 117, 118 in Gudli village) belonging to Hemlata to Govardhan Singh, using fabricated witness signatures. The court found prima facie evidence of forgery and criminal breach of trust under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, and 471/120B against Abrar Husain and Govardhan Singh, but held insufficient grounds against Tehsildar Mahipal Singh. The court ordered that prosecution approval under Section 197 CrPC be obtained from the District Collector before proceeding further, with the next hearing scheduled for September 25, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts