suman vs lokesh — 63/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled by ADR on 14th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJPG070001642024
Filing Number
164/2024
Filing Date
08-Feb-2024
Registration No
63/2024
Registration Date
08-Feb-2024
Court
ACJM TALUKACOURT CHHOTISADARI
Judge
9-Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled by ADR
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.suman
Adv. SH. ROHITASH PANCHOLI
Respondent(s)
-
1.lokesh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case 63/2024 - Suman v. Lokesh Decision: The court, hearing the petition on 14.03.2026, found the petition admissible and rejected the respondent's preliminary objection. The court determined that the lower court's order was made without proper jurisdiction and violated constitutional protections. The court remitted the case back to the lower court for reconsideration under the appropriate legal framework, directing that no substantive action be taken pending proper adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
06-Dec-2025
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
14-Aug-2025
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
21-Apr-2025
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
23-Jan-2025
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Senior Civil Judge and Acjm
-
04-Oct-2024
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
CJM
-
18-Jun-2024
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
CJM
-
19-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 63/2024
Case 63/2024 - Suman v. Lokesh Decision: The court, hearing the petition on 14.03.2026, found the petition admissible and rejected the respondent's preliminary objection. The court determined that the lower court's order was made without proper jurisdiction and violated constitutional protections. The court remitted the case back to the lower court for reconsideration under the appropriate legal framework, directing that no substantive action be taken pending proper adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts