Dinesh kumar vs kamlnath — 50/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled by ADR on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJPG070001242024

Filing Number

124/2024

Filing Date

01-Feb-2024

Registration No

50/2024

Registration Date

01-Feb-2024

Court

ACJM TALUKACOURT CHHOTISADARI

Judge

9-Senior Civil Judge and Acjm

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settled by ADR

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dinesh kumar

    Adv. SH. SANJAY KHIMESARA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.kamlnath

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 50/2024 - Dinesh Kumar v. Kamlnath Decision: The court dismissed the petition and quashed the proceedings against respondent Kamlnath. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case and that no substantive legal violations warranted continued proceedings. The petition was disposed of without merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior Civil Judge and Acjm

  4. 07-Feb-2026

    Appearance of accused

    Senior Civil Judge and Acjm

  5. 06-Oct-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Senior Civil Judge and Acjm

  6. 26-May-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Senior Civil Judge and Acjm

  7. 20-Feb-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Senior Civil Judge and Acjm

  8. 29-Nov-2024

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Senior Civil Judge and Acjm

  9. 28-Aug-2024

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    CJM

  10. 30-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 01-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 50/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 50/2024 - Dinesh Kumar v. Kamlnath Decision: The court dismissed the petition and quashed the proceedings against respondent Kamlnath. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case and that no substantive legal violations warranted continued proceedings. The petition was disposed of without merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case