Laxmilal vs Hansu bharadiya — 6/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled by ADR on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Complaint

CNR: RJPG070000442026

Filing Number

44/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

6/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

ACJM TALUKACOURT CHHOTISADARI

Judge

9-Senior Civil Judge and Acjm

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settled by ADR

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Laxmilal

    Adv. SH. SURENDRA SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Hansu bharadiya

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition filed by Laxmilal against Hansu bharadiya. The petition was heard on 14.03.2026, and the court found that the petitioner had not demonstrated sufficient grounds for interference under the applicable law. The court determined that no case officer had any responsibility to act, and accordingly disposed of the petition as dismissed without further relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior Civil Judge and Acjm

  4. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition filed by Laxmilal against Hansu bharadiya. The petition was heard on 14.03.2026, and the court found that the petitioner had not demonstrated sufficient grounds for interference under the applicable law. The court determined that no case officer had any responsibility to act, and accordingly disposed of the petition as dismissed without further relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case