Laxmilal vs Hansu bharadiya — 6/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled by ADR on 14th March 2026.
Complaint
CNR: RJPG070000442026
Filing Number
44/2026
Filing Date
16-01-2026
Registration No
6/2026
Registration Date
16-01-2026
Court
ACJM TALUKACOURT CHHOTISADARI
Judge
9-Senior Civil Judge and ACJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled by ADR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Laxmilal
Adv. SH. SURENDRA SINGH
Respondent(s)
Hansu bharadiya
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Senior Civil Judge and ACJM
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the petition filed by Laxmilal against Hansu bharadiya. The petition was heard on 14.03.2026, and the court found that the petitioner had not demonstrated sufficient grounds for interference under the applicable law. The court determined that no case officer had any responsibility to act, and accordingly disposed of the petition as dismissed without further relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the petition filed by Laxmilal against Hansu bharadiya. The petition was heard on 14.03.2026, and the court found that the petitioner had not demonstrated sufficient grounds for interference under the applicable law. The court determined that no case officer had any responsibility to act, and accordingly disposed of the petition as dismissed without further relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts