state of rajasthan vs Munna lal Bavri Advocate - Sh. Ram Chandra Malviya — 55/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,325. Disposed: Uncontested--Transferred on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

Session Case

CNR: RJPG060001752020

Filing Number

119/2020

Filing Date

28-Mar-2019

Registration No

55/2020

Registration Date

28-Mar-2019

Court

SC ST COURT PRATAPGARH DISTRICT HQ

Judge

3-District Judge

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Transferred

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

26

Police Station

Arnod

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,325

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.state of rajasthan

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Munna lal Bavri Advocate - Sh. Ram Chandra Malviya

  2. 2.Ramprasad

  3. 3.Sitaram

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court (Pratapgarh, Rajasthan) rejected the petition filed on 07-04-2026 under Section 26 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, finding the allegations unsubstantiated. The court directed that the case be registered with the original court and ordered the imposition of prescribed penalties as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  7. 12-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  8. 28-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  9. 06-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  10. 09-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  11. 27-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  12. 04-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  13. 04-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

  14. 07-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  15. 10-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  16. 03-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  17. 28-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  18. 17-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  19. 08-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  20. 17-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  21. 10-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  22. 15-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  23. 18-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  24. 18-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  25. 20-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  26. 22-Dec-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  27. 18-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  28. 11-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  29. 14-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  30. 24-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  31. 24-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  32. 19-Dec-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  33. 31-Oct-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  34. 16-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  35. 07-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  36. 22-Jul-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  37. 10-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  38. 25-Apr-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  39. 24-Feb-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  40. 04-Jan-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  41. 29-Nov-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  42. 01-Nov-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  43. 04-Sep-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  44. 05-Jul-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  45. 03-May-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  46. 05-Apr-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  47. 08-Dec-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    District Judge

  48. 02-Sep-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    District Judge

  49. 01-Sep-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    District Judge

  50. 06-Aug-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 28-Mar-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 55/2020

casestatus.in Summary

The court (Pratapgarh, Rajasthan) rejected the petition filed on 07-04-2026 under Section 26 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, finding the allegations unsubstantiated. The court directed that the case be registered with the original court and ordered the imposition of prescribed penalties as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case