Aawesh Hussain Abbasi vs State of Rajasthan Advocate - Special Public Prosecutor — 13/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 11th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJPG060000512026
Filing Number
51/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
13/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
SC ST COURT PRATAPGARH DISTRICT HQ
Judge
3-District Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Refused
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
01
Police Station
pratapgarh
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Aawesh Hussain Abbasi
Adv. Sh. Balwant singh Banjara
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Rajasthan Advocate - Special Public Prosecutor
-
2.Anchal Dhobi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The court rejected the second bail petition of Aavesh Hussain Abbasi, accused of extortion, recording obscene videos, blackmail, and forced religious conversion under BNS Section 308(3) and SC/ST Atrocities Act Section 3(1)(r)(s). The court found credible evidence from the police investigation showing the accused falsely posed as a Hindu, obtained compromising photos/videos of the victim, and demanded ₹50,000 while threatening to circulate the content and coerce religious conversion—crimes of serious nature that warranted custody rather than bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 13/2026
Summary The court rejected the second bail petition of Aavesh Hussain Abbasi, accused of extortion, recording obscene videos, blackmail, and forced religious conversion under BNS Section 308(3) and SC/ST Atrocities Act Section 3(1)(r)(s). The court found credible evidence from the police investigation showing the accused falsely posed as a Hindu, obtained compromising photos/videos of the victim, and demanded ₹50,000 while threatening to circulate the content and coerce religious conversion—crimes of serious nature that warranted custody rather than bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts