Aawesh Hussain Abbasi vs State of Rajasthan Advocate - Special Public Prosecutor — 13/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 11th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: RJPG060000512026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

51/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

13/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

SC ST COURT PRATAPGARH DISTRICT HQ

Judge

3-District Judge

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

FIR Details

FIR Number

01

Police Station

pratapgarh

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483,

Petitioner(s)

Aawesh Hussain Abbasi

Adv. Sh. Balwant singh Banjara

Respondent(s)

State of Rajasthan Advocate - Special Public Prosecutor

Anchal Dhobi

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District Judge

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

09-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

07-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order

Summary The court rejected the second bail petition of Aavesh Hussain Abbasi, accused of extortion, recording obscene videos, blackmail, and forced religious conversion under BNS Section 308(3) and SC/ST Atrocities Act Section 3(1)(r)(s). The court found credible evidence from the police investigation showing the accused falsely posed as a Hindu, obtained compromising photos/videos of the victim, and demanded ₹50,000 while threatening to circulate the content and coerce religious conversion—crimes of serious nature that warranted custody rather than bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the second bail petition of Aavesh Hussain Abbasi, accused of extortion, recording obscene videos, blackmail, and forced religious conversion under BNS Section 308(3) and SC/ST Atrocities Act Section 3(1)(r)(s). The court found credible evidence from the police investigation showing the accused falsely posed as a Hindu, obtained compromising photos/videos of the victim, and demanded ₹50,000 while threatening to circulate the content and coerce religious conversion—crimes of serious nature that warranted custody rather than bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SC ST COURT PRATAPGARH DISTRICT HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case