Jagdish Dhobi vs Jay kumar sindhi — 1912/2019

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled by ADR on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJPG020052292019

Filing Number

5187/2019

Filing Date

05-Dec-2019

Registration No

1912/2019

Registration Date

05-Dec-2019

Court

CJM ACJM PGH ACJM AND JM AJM JJB COURT PRATAPGARH DISTRICT HQ

Judge

5-Acjm

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settled by ADR

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jagdish Dhobi

    Adv. Sh. Kapil Teli

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jay kumar sindhi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    —View PDF

    The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (dated 14.03.2026) allowed petitioner Jagdish Dhobi's request to withdraw the case due to an out-of-court settlement reached with respondent Jay Kumar Sindhi. Consequently, the respondent was acquitted of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and the proceedings were disposed of with no further action remaining. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 14-Jan-2026

    Orders

    Acjm

  5. 14-Jan-2026

    Restored

    Acjm

  6. 26-Aug-2025

    OrderView PDF

  7. 26-Aug-2025

    Disposed

    Acjm

  8. 13-Aug-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  9. 01-Aug-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  10. 22-Jul-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  11. 09-Jun-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  12. 25-Apr-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  13. 15-Mar-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  14. 11-Feb-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  15. 16-Dec-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  16. 19-Nov-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  17. 12-Sep-2024

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  18. 16-Jul-2024

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  19. 29-May-2024

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  20. 19-Apr-2024

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  21. 02-Mar-2024

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  22. 09-Jan-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  23. 21-Oct-2023

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  24. 11-Jul-2023

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  25. 30-May-2023

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  26. 12-Apr-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  27. 07-Feb-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  28. 20-Dec-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  29. 16-Nov-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  30. 07-Oct-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  31. 20-Aug-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  32. 16-Jul-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  33. 27-May-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  34. 06-Apr-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  35. 09-Mar-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  36. 15-Jan-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  37. 09-Nov-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  38. 17-Sep-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  39. 16-Jul-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  40. 26-May-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  41. 16-Apr-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  42. 17-Feb-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  43. 12-Dec-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  44. 11-Dec-2020

    Adr u/s Section 89 CPC/ Counseling

    Acjm

  45. 28-Oct-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  46. 11-Aug-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  47. 20-Jun-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  48. 15-May-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  49. 31-Mar-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  50. 19-Feb-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  51. 08-Feb-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  52. 05-Dec-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  53. 05-Dec-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1912/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (dated 14.03.2026) allowed petitioner Jagdish Dhobi's request to withdraw the case due to an out-of-court settlement reached with respondent Jay Kumar Sindhi. Consequently, the respondent was acquitted of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and the proceedings were disposed of with no further action remaining. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case