State of Rajasthan vs Prakash Meghwal — 1561/2025

Case under Rajasthan Excise Act 1950 Section 16,54. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJPG020042412025

e-Filing Number

18-12-2025

Filing Number

4238/2025

Filing Date

18-Dec-2025

Registration No

1561/2025

Registration Date

18-Dec-2025

Court

CJM ACJM PGH ACJM AND JM AJM JJB COURT PRATAPGARH DISTRICT HQ

Judge

4-CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed otherwise

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0291

Police Station

pratapgarh

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Rajasthan Excise Act 1950 Section 16,54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Rajasthan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prakash Meghwal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    —View PDF

    The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the petition filed by the State of Rajasthan against Prakash Meghwal regarding an order under the Rajasthan Government Servant Conduct Rules, 1950. The court found that the respondent's suspension was properly imposed and that no other procedural defect existed, dismissing the plea without merit and ordering the respondent to comply with the court's directions under Section 360 IPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CJM

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    CJM

  5. 21-Jan-2026

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    CJM

  6. 14-Jan-2026

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    CJM

  7. 13-Jan-2026

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    CJM

  8. 18-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 18-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1561/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the petition filed by the State of Rajasthan against Prakash Meghwal regarding an order under the Rajasthan Government Servant Conduct Rules, 1950. The court found that the respondent's suspension was properly imposed and that no other procedural defect existed, dismissing the plea without merit and ordering the respondent to comply with the court's directions under Section 360 IPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case