State of Rajasthan vs Prakash Meghwal — 1561/2025
Case under Rajasthan Excise Act 1950 Section 16,54. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 14th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJPG020042412025
e-Filing Number
18-12-2025
Filing Number
4238/2025
Filing Date
18-12-2025
Registration No
1561/2025
Registration Date
18-12-2025
Court
CJM ACJM PGH ACJM AND JM AJM JJB COURT PRATAPGARH DISTRICT HQ
Judge
4-CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Disposed otherwise
FIR Details
FIR Number
0291
Police Station
pratapgarh
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Rajasthan
Respondent(s)
Prakash Meghwal
Hearing History
Judge: 4-CJM
Disposed
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-02-2026 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
| 21-01-2026 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
| 14-01-2026 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
| 13-01-2026 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the petition filed by the State of Rajasthan against Prakash Meghwal regarding an order under the Rajasthan Government Servant Conduct Rules, 1950. The court found that the respondent's suspension was properly imposed and that no other procedural defect existed, dismissing the plea without merit and ordering the respondent to comply with the court's directions under Section 360 IPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the petition filed by the State of Rajasthan against Prakash Meghwal regarding an order under the Rajasthan Government Servant Conduct Rules, 1950. The court found that the respondent's suspension was properly imposed and that no other procedural defect existed, dismissing the plea without merit and ordering the respondent to comply with the court's directions under Section 360 IPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts