State of Rajasthan vs Shantilal Meena — 1508/2025

Case under Rajasthan Excise Act 1950 Section 16,54. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled by ADR on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJPG020041232025

Filing Number

4120/2025

Filing Date

15-Dec-2025

Registration No

1508/2025

Registration Date

15-Dec-2025

Court

CJM ACJM PGH ACJM AND JM AJM JJB COURT PRATAPGARH DISTRICT HQ

Judge

5-Acjm

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settled by ADR

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

39

Police Station

Excise circle Pratapgarh

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Rajasthan Excise Act 1950 Section 16,54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Rajasthan

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shantilal Meena

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    View PDF

    The court granted the State of Rajasthan's petition to withdraw prosecution under the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 against Shantilal Meena for a first-time liquor offense where 10 liters of alcohol were seized, finding withdrawal in public interest justified. The accused was acquitted of charges under Sections 16/54 of the Excise Act, and seized liquor was ordered destroyed after appeal period expiration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  8. 15-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 15-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1508/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the State of Rajasthan's petition to withdraw prosecution under the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 against Shantilal Meena for a first-time liquor offense where 10 liters of alcohol were seized, finding withdrawal in public interest justified. The accused was acquitted of charges under Sections 16/54 of the Excise Act, and seized liquor was ordered destroyed after appeal period expiration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case