State of Rajasthan vs RAMESH CHARPOTA — 1235/2025
Case under Rajasthan Excise Act 1950 Section 16,54. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 14th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJPG020035012025
e-Filing Number
14-11-2025
Filing Number
3499/2025
Filing Date
14-11-2025
Registration No
1235/2025
Registration Date
14-11-2025
Court
CJM ACJM PGH ACJM AND JM AJM JJB COURT PRATAPGARH DISTRICT HQ
Judge
4-CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Disposed otherwise
FIR Details
FIR Number
0033
Police Station
Ghantali
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Rajasthan
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
RAMESH CHARPOTA
Hearing History
Judge: 4-CJM
Disposed
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-01-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 14-11-2025 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The State of Rajasthan's petition challenging an excise officer's order regarding alleged illegal liquor possession by Ramesh Charpota was dismissed. The court found that the respondent's appeal against the excise officer's order was valid, confirming that the alleged seized liquor quantity (10 liters) was properly documented and that the officer's findings under the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 were lawful, thereby upholding the administrative action without merit in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The State of Rajasthan's petition challenging an excise officer's order regarding alleged illegal liquor possession by Ramesh Charpota was dismissed. The court found that the respondent's appeal against the excise officer's order was valid, confirming that the alleged seized liquor quantity (10 liters) was properly documented and that the officer's findings under the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 were lawful, thereby upholding the administrative action without merit in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts