State of Rajasthan vs RAMESH CHARPOTA — 1235/2025

Case under Rajasthan Excise Act 1950 Section 16,54. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJPG020035012025

e-Filing Number

14-11-2025

Filing Number

3499/2025

Filing Date

14-Nov-2025

Registration No

1235/2025

Registration Date

14-Nov-2025

Court

CJM ACJM PGH ACJM AND JM AJM JJB COURT PRATAPGARH DISTRICT HQ

Judge

4-CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed otherwise

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0033

Police Station

Ghantali

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Rajasthan Excise Act 1950 Section 16,54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Rajasthan

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH CHARPOTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    —View PDF

    The State of Rajasthan's petition challenging an excise officer's order regarding alleged illegal liquor possession by Ramesh Charpota was dismissed. The court found that the respondent's appeal against the excise officer's order was valid, confirming that the alleged seized liquor quantity (10 liters) was properly documented and that the officer's findings under the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 were lawful, thereby upholding the administrative action without merit in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CJM

  4. 05-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  5. 14-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 14-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1235/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The State of Rajasthan's petition challenging an excise officer's order regarding alleged illegal liquor possession by Ramesh Charpota was dismissed. The court found that the respondent's appeal against the excise officer's order was valid, confirming that the alleged seized liquor quantity (10 liters) was properly documented and that the officer's findings under the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 were lawful, thereby upholding the administrative action without merit in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case