state of rajasthan vs Firoz — 1406/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,34. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 14th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJPG020033582022
Filing Number
3332/2022
Filing Date
03-Sep-2022
Registration No
1406/2022
Registration Date
03-Sep-2022
Court
CJM ACJM PGH ACJM AND JM AJM JJB COURT PRATAPGARH DISTRICT HQ
Judge
4-CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Disposed otherwise
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
111
Police Station
pratapgarh
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.state of rajasthan
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Firoz
-
2.Firoz aka Sonu
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
The Rajasthan State Public Interest Litigation court rejected the petitioner's plea regarding jurisdiction and proper procedure. The court held that since the respondents lack the required statutory authority to exercise jurisdictional powers, no action can proceed against them without proper police authorization and direction. The case was disposed with directions to file appropriate CIS (Criminal Investigation Scheme) proceedings as per procedural requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
CJM
-
06-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
26-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
18-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
24-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
02-May-2025
Prosecution Evidence
-
05-Feb-2025
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
13-Nov-2024
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
12-Aug-2024
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
28-May-2024
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
05-Apr-2024
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
03-Jan-2024
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
05-Aug-2023
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
19-Apr-2023
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
09-Jan-2023
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
03-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Sep-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 1406/2022
The Rajasthan State Public Interest Litigation court rejected the petitioner's plea regarding jurisdiction and proper procedure. The court held that since the respondents lack the required statutory authority to exercise jurisdictional powers, no action can proceed against them without proper police authorization and direction. The case was disposed with directions to file appropriate CIS (Criminal Investigation Scheme) proceedings as per procedural requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts