State of Rajasthan vs Najma Muslim — 1096/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,504,34. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 14th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJPG020031712024
e-Filing Number
01-10-2024
Filing Number
3159/2024
Filing Date
01-Oct-2024
Registration No
1096/2024
Registration Date
01-Oct-2024
Court
CJM ACJM PGH ACJM AND JM AJM JJB COURT PRATAPGARH DISTRICT HQ
Judge
4-CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Disposed otherwise
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
338
Police Station
pratapgarh
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Rajasthan
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Najma Muslim
-
2.Firoz Muslim
-
3.Feeza Muslim
-
4.Mohsin Muslim
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the petition filed by the State of Rajasthan against respondents Najma Muslim, Firoz Muslim, and Feeza Muslim. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish sufficient grounds for relief and that the respondents' right to petition the State Public Service Commission could not be denied based on alleged procedural defects. The court directed that case file be filed in CIS (Case Information System) and dismissed the case as per applicable procedural rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
CJM
-
08-Jan-2026
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
CJM
-
07-Jan-2026
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
CJM
-
09-Oct-2025
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
CJM
-
06-Aug-2025
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
CJM
-
15-May-2025
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
CJM
-
23-Jan-2025
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
CJM
-
01-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1096/2024
The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the petition filed by the State of Rajasthan against respondents Najma Muslim, Firoz Muslim, and Feeza Muslim. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish sufficient grounds for relief and that the respondents' right to petition the State Public Service Commission could not be denied based on alleged procedural defects. The court directed that case file be filed in CIS (Case Information System) and dismissed the case as per applicable procedural rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts