State of Rajasthan vs Anita Jat — 1074/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,427,504,506. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJPG020031402024

e-Filing Number

01-06-2024

Filing Number

3128/2024

Filing Date

30-Sep-2024

Registration No

1074/2024

Registration Date

30-Sep-2024

Court

CJM ACJM PGH ACJM AND JM AJM JJB COURT PRATAPGARH DISTRICT HQ

Judge

4-CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed otherwise

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

122

Police Station

pratapgarh

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,427,504,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Rajasthan

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Anita Jat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    —View PDF

    The State of Rajasthan's petition challenging the appointment of Anita Jat was dismissed by the National Public Interest Litigation Court on March 14, 2026. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish sufficient grounds to question the appointment and that no actionable defects existed in the appointment process. The court upheld the appointment and directed that related case files be disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CJM

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  6. 14-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  7. 29-Jul-2025

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    CJM

  8. 24-Apr-2025

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    CJM

  9. 17-Jan-2025

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    CJM

  10. 30-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 30-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1074/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The State of Rajasthan's petition challenging the appointment of Anita Jat was dismissed by the National Public Interest Litigation Court on March 14, 2026. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish sufficient grounds to question the appointment and that no actionable defects existed in the appointment process. The court upheld the appointment and directed that related case files be disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case