Mahesh Kumar Paliwal vs Khatu Shyam Enterpirses — 830/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled by ADR on 14th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJPG020024602024
Filing Number
2452/2024
Filing Date
05-Aug-2024
Registration No
830/2024
Registration Date
05-Aug-2024
Court
CJM ACJM PGH ACJM AND JM AJM JJB COURT PRATAPGARH DISTRICT HQ
Judge
5-Acjm
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled by ADR
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mahesh Kumar Paliwal
Adv. Sh. Lalit Narayan Shukla
Respondent(s)
-
1.Khatu Shyam Enterpirses
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Case Summary: 830/2024 The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissed the case on 14.03.2026 following a settlement between petitioner Mahesh Kumar Paliwal and respondent Shubham Sikroliya. The accused Shubham was acquitted of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to the parties' pre-dispute compromise reached through the Lok Adalat mechanism. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Acjm
-
07-Jan-2026
Orders
Acjm
-
01-Nov-2025
Appearance of accused
Acjm
-
15-Oct-2025
Appearance of accused
CJM
-
15-Sep-2025
Appearance of accused
CJM
-
02-Jul-2025
Appearance of accused
CJM
-
03-Jun-2025
Appearance of accused
CJM
-
05-May-2025
Appearance of accused
-
04-Apr-2025
Appearance of accused
CJM
-
03-Mar-2025
Appearance of accused
CJM
-
10-Jan-2025
Appearance of accused
CJM
-
21-Dec-2024
Appearance of accused
CJM
-
03-Dec-2024
Appearance of accused
CJM
-
11-Nov-2024
Appearance of accused
CJM
-
30-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 830/2024
Case Summary: 830/2024 The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissed the case on 14.03.2026 following a settlement between petitioner Mahesh Kumar Paliwal and respondent Shubham Sikroliya. The accused Shubham was acquitted of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to the parties' pre-dispute compromise reached through the Lok Adalat mechanism. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts