State of Rajasthan vs Nirmal kumar patidar — 531/2025

Case under Arms Act Section 25,4. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 23rd March 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJPG020015862025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

31-05-2025

Filing Number

1585/2025

Filing Date

31-05-2025

Registration No

531/2025

Registration Date

31-05-2025

Court

CJM ACJM PGH ACJM AND JM AJM JJB COURT PRATAPGARH DISTRICT HQ

Judge

5-ACJM

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation

FIR Details

FIR Number

39

Police Station

Hathunia

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 25,4

Petitioner(s)

State of Rajasthan

Respondent(s)

Nirmal kumar patidar

Hearing History

Judge: 5-ACJM

23-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

Final arguments

09-03-2026

Final arguments

04-03-2026

Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

17-02-2026

Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Pratapgarh convicted Nirmal Kumar (age 34) under Section 4/25 of the Arms Act for possessing and carrying a prohibited sharp-edged sword (talwar) measuring 30 cm without valid authorization on March 31, 2025. The court found the prosecution's evidence—comprising police witness testimonies and documentary evidence—credible and sufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, rejecting the defense's argument that all witnesses were police personnel. Sentence: Instead of immediate imprisonment, the court granted the accused the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act for one year with a personal bond of ₹10,000 and ordered payment of ₹500 prosecution costs, considering his first-time offender status and family dependence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Pratapgarh convicted Nirmal Kumar (age 34) under Section 4/25 of the Arms Act for possessing and carrying a prohibited sharp-edged sword (talwar) measuring 30 cm without valid authorization on March 31, 2025. The court found the prosecution's evidence—comprising police witness testimonies and documentary evidence—credible and sufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, rejecting the defense's argument that all witnesses were police personnel. Sentence: Instead of immediate imprisonment, the court granted the accused the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act for one year with a personal bond of ₹10,000 and ordered payment of ₹500 prosecution costs, considering his first-time offender status and family dependence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CJM ACJM PGH ACJM AND JM AJM JJB COURT PRATAPGARH DISTRICT HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case