State of Rajasthan vs Shyamlal Meena — 306/2024
Case under Arms Act Section 4,25. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 08th April 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJPG020008802024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
877/2024
Filing Date
16-03-2024
Registration No
306/2024
Registration Date
16-03-2024
Court
CJM ACJM PGH ACJM AND JM AJM JJB COURT PRATAPGARH DISTRICT HQ
Judge
4-CJM
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation
FIR Details
FIR Number
05
Police Station
pratapgarh
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Rajasthan
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
Shyamlal Meena
Hearing History
Judge: 4-CJM
Disposed
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 23-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 09-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 25-02-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Pratapgarh convicted Shamlal (age 30) under Section 4/25 of the Arms Act, 1959, finding him guilty of illegally possessing a naked dagger (24 inches long) without proper authorization on January 2, 2024. The court rejected the defense's arguments that prosecution witnesses were biased police officials, holding their testimony as credible and sufficiently proving the offense beyond reasonable doubt. Shamlal was sentenced to imprisonment with a fine of ₹10,000 and directed to furnish bail bonds for good behavior. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Pratapgarh convicted Shamlal (age 30) under Section 4/25 of the Arms Act, 1959, finding him guilty of illegally possessing a naked dagger (24 inches long) without proper authorization on January 2, 2024. The court rejected the defense's arguments that prosecution witnesses were biased police officials, holding their testimony as credible and sufficiently proving the offense beyond reasonable doubt. Shamlal was sentenced to imprisonment with a fine of ₹10,000 and directed to furnish bail bonds for good behavior. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts