state of rajasthan vs Harish Advocate - Sh. Balwant singh Banjara — 264/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJPG020006362022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
631/2022
Filing Date
08-03-2022
Registration No
264/2022
Registration Date
08-03-2022
Court
CJM ACJM PGH ACJM AND JM AJM JJB COURT PRATAPGARH DISTRICT HQ
Judge
5-ACJM
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
20
Police Station
Dhamotar
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
state of rajasthan
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
Harish Advocate - Sh. Balwant singh Banjara
Hearing History
Judge: 5-ACJM
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 27-02-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 18-02-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 17-02-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Rajasthan State v. Harish (CIS No. 264/2022) The court acquitted the accused Harish of charges under Section 498A IPC (cruelty by husband/in-laws). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove dowry-related harassment and mistreatment with sufficient specificity—no concrete dates, amounts demanded, or particular incidents were established. The evidence revealed the primary marital discord stemmed from a photograph involving the wife with another man, not dowry demands, and the wife continued her nursing studies during marriage, contradicting claims she was prevented from studying. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Rajasthan State v. Harish (CIS No. 264/2022) The court acquitted the accused Harish of charges under Section 498A IPC (cruelty by husband/in-laws). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove dowry-related harassment and mistreatment with sufficient specificity—no concrete dates, amounts demanded, or particular incidents were established. The evidence revealed the primary marital discord stemmed from a photograph involving the wife with another man, not dowry demands, and the wife continued her nursing studies during marriage, contradicting claims she was prevented from studying. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts