Abhishek Patidar vs Unknown — 32/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(2). Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Final Report - FR

CNR: RJPG020001642026

e-Filing Number

13-01-2026

Filing Number

164/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

32/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

CJM ACJM PGH ACJM AND JM AJM JJB COURT PRATAPGARH DISTRICT HQ

Judge

4-CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed otherwise

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0418

Police Station

pratapgarh

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Abhishek Patidar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Unknown

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    View PDF

    Case Summary: 32/2026 Court Decision: The National Public Interest Litigation Court dismissed petitioner Abhishek Patidar's petition filed on 14.03.2026. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish sufficient grounds for judicial intervention and that the allegations lacked merit. Reasoning: The court noted that the petitioner's claims regarding police misconduct and procedural irregularities were not substantiated with proper evidence. The court upheld the lower court's decision and directed the petitioner to file an appeal through the proper legal channels if aggrieved, with orders uploaded on the same date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CJM

  4. 13-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 32/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 32/2026 Court Decision: The National Public Interest Litigation Court dismissed petitioner Abhishek Patidar's petition filed on 14.03.2026. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish sufficient grounds for judicial intervention and that the allegations lacked merit. Reasoning: The court noted that the petitioner's claims regarding police misconduct and procedural irregularities were not substantiated with proper evidence. The court upheld the lower court's decision and directed the petitioner to file an appeal through the proper legal channels if aggrieved, with orders uploaded on the same date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case