State of Rajasthan vs Karma Meena — 33/2026

Case under Rajasthan Excise Act 1950 Section 16,54. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJPG020000842026

e-Filing Number

07-01-2026

Filing Number

84/2026

Filing Date

07-Jan-2026

Registration No

33/2026

Registration Date

07-Jan-2026

Court

CJM ACJM PGH ACJM AND JM AJM JJB COURT PRATAPGARH DISTRICT HQ

Judge

4-CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed otherwise

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0273

Police Station

pratapgarh

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Rajasthan Excise Act 1950 Section 16,54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Rajasthan

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Karma Meena

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    —View PDF

    Summary of Case 33/2026: State of Rajasthan v. Karma Meena The court partially allowed the petition filed by the State of Rajasthan against Karma Meena under the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950. The respondent was found to have violated excise laws by possessing and transporting liquor without proper authorization; the court upheld the seizure of 10 liters of alcohol and imposed a penalty under Section 360 IPC but found insufficient grounds to proceed on certain additional charges raised by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CJM

  4. 07-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 33/2026: State of Rajasthan v. Karma Meena The court partially allowed the petition filed by the State of Rajasthan against Karma Meena under the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950. The respondent was found to have violated excise laws by possessing and transporting liquor without proper authorization; the court upheld the seizure of 10 liters of alcohol and imposed a penalty under Section 360 IPC but found insufficient grounds to proceed on certain additional charges raised by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case